Is Vince as bad as he's made out to be?
I'm a bit flummoxed to be honest.
Although there seems to be an awful lot of negative flak flying about on here about VS, there is also the odd positive comment from people who HAVE made money following his methods and recommendations.
I've clocked the results of a "quick Google" by another member, and yes, there is some other stuff kicking about, but with few real opinions. It mostly seems noncommital than negative.
I'm intrigued that with all the comments about how much of a "crook" he (allegedly) is, I can't actually find a huge amount of feedback on the web panning him.
(Except on here, of course...)
Is this not a case of people paying out money to Vince and then not actually doing anything with the method, merely flicking through the manual, "oh...that won't work" and then crying that they've "lost" their money?
I'm finding it very confusing that with all the comments on here about his dishonesty and (alleged) shark-like qualities, I can't find a single thing about him or his fulfillment company on the advertising standards website. Hmmm....
Comments elsewhere about somebody losing £6k from £10k trading capital in a very short timeframe make me think that an awful lot of people on here doling out "advice" don't know half as much as they think they do.
As time goes on, I'm more and more getting the impression that there are a lot of theorists on here, but a lot less actual active traders, (no - not demo accounts), and still fewer that are actually making money.
(Edited for p*ss poor spelling)