Ukraine invasion

West cares little about human lives, is interested in Russia’s resources

EU tariffs on grain from Russia, Belarus enter into effect

Nikki Haley urges Republicans to prepare for Biden’s replacement

Davos founder accused of sexism — WSJ







 

All about NATO membership!!!

Has nought to do with energy.
The only energy perspective around this war, is more about US blowing up the Norsk pipeline and replacing cheap Russian gas to EU with more expensive LPG from the USA.

It's all about NATO membership and prospect of putting nukes in Ukraine few seconds away from Russia leaving no time to react.


And that's the problem with these kinds of clips which have no substance and designed to mislead Joe public. 👿
 

Save Ukraine from American meddling

For those who prefer facts to fiction - here is a really good article published in The Hill by Prof. Jeffrey Sachs in which he argues that Ukraine will not be saved by the U.S. but, rather, what Ukraine really needs is the exact opposite: to be saved from the U.S. What's especially good about it is that all of his claims are fully referenced with links to the original source, including:-
  • The solemn U.S. promise that NATO would not expand “one inch eastward”.
  • The William Burns memo famously entitled “Nyet means Nyet”.
  • The astounding intercepted call between Victoria Nuland and U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt, where they talk about who should be in the new Ukrainian government several weeks before the 2014 CIA backed coup.
  • The interview with former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett in which he details how the peace deal he brokered between Zelensky and Putin was scuppered by the U.S. and U.K.
This interview with Prof. Sachs complements the article linked above and is well worth a watch / listen. Enjoy . . .

 
Last edited:
A non-partisan research post - London
----------------------------------------------------

The trumpet shines ...​

Trump.png

Trump Wins Partial Victory: Supreme Court Says He Has Some Presidential Immunity From Charges​

 
Last edited:

Save Ukraine from American meddling

For those who prefer facts to fiction - here is a really good article published in The Hill by Prof. Jeffrey Sachs in which he argues that Ukraine will not be saved by the U.S. but, rather, what Ukraine really needs is the exact opposite: to be saved from the U.S. What's especially good about it is that all of his claims are fully referenced with links to the original source, including:-
  • The solemn U.S. promise that NATO would not expand “one inch eastward”.
  • The William Burns memo famously entitled “Nyet means Nyet”.
  • The astounding intercepted call between Victoria Nuland and U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt, where they talk about who should be in the new Ukrainian government several weeks before the 2014 CIA backed coup.
  • The interview with former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett in which he details how the peace deal he brokered between Zelensky and Putin was scuppered by the U.S. and U.K.
A non-partisan research post - London
----------------------------------------------------

Ukraine and weapons of mass destruction​

Ukraine, formerly a republic of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) from 1922–1991, once hosted Soviet nuclear weapons and delivery systems on its territory.[1] The former Soviet Union had its nuclear program expanded to only four of its republics: Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine. After its dissolution in 1991, Ukraine became the third largest nuclear power in the world and held about one third of the former Soviet nuclear weapons, delivery system, and significant knowledge of its design and production.[2] Ukraine inherited about 130 UR-100N intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) with six warheads each, 46 RT-23 Molodets ICBMs with ten warheads apiece, as well as 33 heavy bombers, totaling approximately 1,700 nuclear warheads remained on Ukrainian territory.[3]

While all these weapons were located on Ukrainian territory, Russia controlled the launch sequence and maintained operational control of the nuclear warheads and its weapons system.[4] In 1994, Ukraine agreed to transfer these weapons to Russia and became a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, in exchange for assurances from Russia, the United States and United Kingdom to respect the Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders.[5][6] The decision by Ukraine to give up the nuclear weapons was debated when Russia, one of the parties of the agreement, invaded Ukraine.

source: wikipedia
  • Ukraine became the third largest nuclear power in the world and held about one third of the former Soviet nuclear weapons, delivery system,
  • Russia controlled the launch sequence and maintained operational control of the nuclear warheads and its weapons system
Where was this nuclear arsenal again ...... ?????

Does not take a genius to suss the geopolitical hypocricy !

a quick gander and ....


NATO's rebuttal..copy & past from NATO site (note: within limits of available time did not find any direct Russian 'authoritative' citations for comparison - unhappy YouTubers with psychological and personality disorders grinding their agenda axes are not authoritative or credible)

NATO: Setting the record straight​

De-bunking Russian disinformation on NATO​

Russia's illegal war of aggression against Ukraine has shattered peace in Europe. NATO's Strategic Concept states that Russia is the most significant and direct threat to Allies' security and to peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic area. Russia wants to establish spheres of influence and control other countries through coercion, subversion, aggression and annexation. It uses conventional, cyber and hybrid means – including disinformation – against NATO Allies and partners.

NATO does not seek confrontation and poses no threat to Russia. The Alliance will continue to respond to Russian threats and actions in a united and responsible way. We are significantly strengthening our deterrence and defence, supporting our partners, and enhancing our resilience. This includes calling out Russia's actions and countering disinformation.

Myth:

NATO is at war with Russia in Ukraine​

FACT
NATO is not at war with Russia. We do not seek confrontation with Russia. NATO supports Ukraine in its right to self-defence, as enshrined in the UN Charter. In response to Russia's aggressive actions, we continue to strengthen our deterrence and defence to make sure there is no room for misunderstanding that NATO is ready to protect and defend every Ally.
NATO is a defensive Alliance. Our core task is to keep our nations safe. At the Vilnius Summit, Allies reaffirmed their iron-clad commitment to defend every inch of Allied territory at all times. We will continue to protect our one billion people, and safeguard freedom and democracy, in accordance with Article 5 of the Washington Treaty.

Myth:

NATO promised Russia it would not expand after the Cold War​

FACT
Such an agreement was never made. NATO’s door has been open to new members since it was founded in 1949. This has never changed. No treaty signed by NATO Allies and Russia included provisions on NATO membership. Decisions on NATO membership are taken by consensus among all Allies. Russia does not have a veto.
The idea of NATO enlargement beyond a united Germany was not on the agenda in 1989, particularly as the Warsaw Pact still existed until 1991. Mikhail Gorbachev said in an interview in 2014: "The topic of 'NATO expansion' was not discussed at all, and it wasn't brought up in those years. I say this with full responsibility. Not a single Eastern European country raised the issue, not even after the Warsaw Pact ceased to exist in 1991. Western leaders didn't bring it up either."
Individual Allies cannot make agreements on NATO’s behalf. President Clinton consistently refused Boris Yeltsin's offer to commit that no former Soviet Republics would join NATO: "I can't make commitments on behalf of NATO, and I'm not going to be in the position myself of vetoing NATO expansion with respect to any country, much less letting you or anyone else do so… NATO operates by consensus," he said.

  • The wording “NATO expansion” is already part of the myth.
  • NATO did not hunt for new members or want to “expand eastward.
  • ” NATO respects every nation’s right to choose its own path.
  • NATO membership is a decision for NATO Allies and those countries who wish to join alone.

Myth:

NATO is aggressive​

FACT
NATO is a defensive alliance. It does not seek confrontation and poses no threat to Russia, or any other nations. NATO did not invade Georgia. NATO did not invade Ukraine. Russia did.
NATO made significant efforts over many years to establish a strategic partnership with Russia. We established the NATO-Russia Council and worked together on issues ranging from counter-narcotics and counter-terrorism to submarine rescue and civil emergency planning, even during periods of NATO enlargement.
It was Russia that gradually chipped away at any hopes of peaceful cooperation, with its pattern of increasing aggressive behaviour, from Grozny to Georgia and Aleppo to Ukraine.
NATO Allies engaged in persistent diplomatic efforts to convince Russia to change its course. NATO held a last meeting of the NATO-Russia Council in January 2022 to call on President Putin to step back from the brink. President Putin chose war.

Myth:

NATO's deployments are a threat to Russia​

FACT
In response to Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea and destabilisation of eastern Ukraine in 2014, NATO suspended practical cooperation with Russia, while maintaining political and military dialogue. We deployed four multinational battlegroups to the Baltic States and Poland in 2016. Before Russia's aggressive actions in 2014, there was no deployment of combat-ready NATO troops in the eastern part of the Alliance.
Following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, NATO has further reinforced its deterrence and defence posture. We have doubled the number of multinational battlegroups in the east of the Alliance from four to eight and put 40,000 troops under direct NATO command. We will continue to do what is needed to protect and defend every inch of Allied soil.
NATO exercises and military deployments are not directed against Russia, or any other country. Outside NATO territory, the Alliance has a KFOR peacekeeping mission in Kosovo based on a United Nations Security Council mandate, and a train and assist mission in Iraq contributing to the fight against terrorism at the request of the Iraqi government.
It is Russia's aggressive actions that have shattered peace in Europe and are undermining international security and stability. As well as its aggression against Ukraine, Russia has military bases and soldiers in Georgia and Moldova without the consent of their governments.

Myth:

NATO is encircling Russia​

FACT
Russia is the world's largest country geographically. It is almost twice the size of the US and China.
When Finland joined the Alliance in April 2023, NATO's land border with Russia more than doubled. Even after Finland's accession, only 11% of Russia's land border is shared with NATO countries.
No one has backed Russia into a corner. It is hard to encircle a country with eleven time zones.
Russian-borders.png



Myth:

Ukraine will not join NATO​

FACT
Ukraine will become a member of NATO. NATO supports the every country's right to choose its own security arrangements, including Ukraine. NATO's door remains open. NATO Allies decide on NATO membership. Russia does not have a veto.
At the Vilnius Summit, Allies reaffirmed the commitment they made at the 2008 Summit in Bucharest that Ukraine will become a member of the Alliance when conditions are met and Allies agree. They agreed to remove the requirement for a Membership Action Plan, changing Ukraine's membership path from a two-step to a one-step process.
NATO is stepping up its political and practical cooperation with Ukraine. President Zelenskyy attended the first meeting of the NATO-Ukraine Council at the Vilnius Summit, a platform for crisis consultation and decision-making between equals.
NATO has also agreed a new multi-year assistance programme to help the Ukrainian armed forces transition from Soviet-era to NATO standards and strengthen Ukraine's security and defence sector to resist further Russian aggression. Ukraine is already closer to NATO that it has ever been. In Vilnius, Allied leaders reiterated that Ukraine's future is in NATO.

Myth:

NATO's out of area operations prove that the Alliance is not defensive​

FACT
NATO intervened in the former Yugoslavia to stop bloodshed and save lives. From 1992-1995, NATO conducted several military operations in Bosnia, including enforcing a no-fly-zone and providing air support for UN peacekeepers. These activities were mandated by the United Nations Security Council, of which Russia is a member. NATO air strikes against Bosnian Serb positions in 1995 helped pave the way for the Dayton peace agreement, which ended the war in Bosnia that had killed over 100,000 people. From 1996, NATO led multinational peacekeeping forces in Bosnia, which included troops from Russia. The European Union took over that mission in 2004.
NATO's operation in Kosovo in 1999 followed a year of intense international diplomatic efforts, which included Russia, to end the conflict. The UN Security Council repeatedly branded the ethnic cleansing in Kosovo and the growing number of refugees as a threat to international peace and security. NATO's mission helped to end large-scale and sustained violations of human rights and the killing of civilians. KFOR, NATO's ongoing peacekeeping mission in Kosovo, has a UNSC mandate (UNSCR 1244) and is supported by both Belgrade and Pristina.
The NATO-led operation in Libya in 2011 was launched under the authority of two UN Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs 1970 and 1973), neither of which was opposed by Russia. UNSCR 1973 authorised the international community "to take all necessary measures" to "protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack". This is what NATO did, with the political and military support of regional states and members of the Arab League.

https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/115204.htm
 
Last edited:



Black Russian officer shares his impressions of serving in special military operation zone
See more at https://english.pravda.ru/news/society/159893-black-russian-officer/



 
A non-partisan research post - London
----------------------------------------------------
Additional Bonus:

Nations Undergo Rigorous Process to Join NATO

Nations Undergo Rigorous Process to Join NATO


A key determining factor for potential NATO members is whether their admission will strengthen the alliance and further increase security and stability across Europe.
www.defense.gov
Minimum Requirements for NATO Membership
Minimum Requirements for NATO Membership
Ex-Nato head says Putin wanted to join alliance early on in his rule

Vladimir Putin said in 2000 that he ‘cannot imagine my own country in isolation from Europe and what we often call the civilised world’.

Vladimir Putin wanted Russia to join Nato but did not want his country to have to go through the usual application process and stand in line “with a lot of countries that don’t matter”, according to a former secretary general of the transatlantic alliance.

Ex-Nato head says Putin wanted to join alliance early on in his rule

George Robertson recalls Russian president did not want to wait in line with ‘countries that don’t matter’
www.theguardian.com
www.theguardian.com
In 2000 Putin told George Robertson, the Secretary General of NATO at that time, that he wanted Russia to join NATO but would not like to go through the usual application process.[32]

Russia–NATO relations - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
NATO OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND PRESS ACADEMIC AFFAIR UNIT : SHOULD RUSSIA JOIN NATO?
(FINAL REPORT)
Prof. Yuriy DAVYDO
https://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/98-00/davydov.pdf
Russian president Vladimir Putin wants you to believe that NATO is responsible for his February 24 invasion of Ukraine—that rounds of NATO enlargement made Russia insecure, forcing Putin to lash out. This argument has two key flaws. First, NATO has been a variable and not a constant source of tension between Russia and the West. Moscow has in the past acknowledged Ukraine’s right to join NATO; the Kremlin’s complaints about the alliance spike in a clear pattern after democratic breakthroughs in the post-Soviet space. This highlights a second flaw: Since Putin fears democracy and the threat that it poses to his regime, and not expanded NATO membership, taking the latter off the table will not quell his insecurity. His declared goal of the invasion, the “denazification” of Ukraine, is a code for his real aim: antidemocratic regime change.

What Putin Fears Most | Journal of Democracy

Forget his excuses. Russia’s autocrat doesn’t worry about NATO. What terrifies him is the prospect of a flourishing Ukrainian democracy.
www.journalofdemocracy.org
 
Last edited:

Biden ‘united Democrats and Republicans’ with debate performance – Musk

Western partners drove Kiev to abandon neutrality — Hungarian expert

Ukraine needs some 200,000 recruits to address troop shortages

Losing more than 50,000 per month - that's not a full replacement

 
All about NATO membership!!!
.............................
It's all about NATO membership and prospect of putting nukes in Ukraine few seconds away from Russia leaving no time to react.
...........
And that's the problem with these kinds of clips which have no substance and designed to mislead Joe public. 👿

Screenshot from 2024-07-01 22-29-38.png

 
Last edited:



NATO looks to appoint official in charge of support for Ukraine — WSJ

Bardella or Melenchon? Who will be the next anti-Ukrainian prime minister of France?
See more at https://english.pravda.ru/world/159901-french-elections/

This is what US allies should learn from the Biden-Trump debate

 
A non-partisan research post - London
----------------------------------------------------

How Does Anyone Still Care About This Bullshit?​


CAITLIN JOHNSTONE

Caitlin Johnstone​

Ideology

I’ve always called myself a socialist. Lately a lot of people have been calling me a communist, which I don’t mind either. Really I just support shoving things as far to the left as possible until we’ve created a healthy and harmonious world and moved from competition-based systems to systems in which we collaborate with each other and with our ecosystem for the good of everyone.

 
I always think that any person representing the people should not receive donations of any kind from any body, corporations or country.

It skews decision making process.

Elections should be financed by tax payers to remove inherent bias in donations.

For example, Tories get financed by corporations and rich elite, Labour party is essentially financed by trade unions. The mutual interests of the UK are torn between these two sides with one side leap frogging the other after a decade or so.

In the US corporations own the system. Democracy is a bit of a game that's played to the public by the elite. Much like jerking peeps off to keep them happy once every four years.
 
A non-partisan research post - London
----------------------------------------------------

How Ukraine ‘battlefield taxis’ destroyed Russia’s best tank T-90M | War on Tape​

 
A non-partisan research post - London
----------------------------------------------------

Why Have So Many Abrams Tanks Been Destroyed in Ukraine? | War on Tape​

 

 

BBC presenter calls for Trump to be assassinated

Beijing criticizes NATO for shifting blame in Ukraine conflict, urges self-reflection

Hungarian Prime Minister Orban visits Kyiv to discuss peace with Russia
See more at https://english.pravda.ru/news/world/159907-orban-zelensky-peace/

Russian General Staff: Russia to complete special military operation in late 2024
See more at https://english.pravda.ru/news/world/159905-russia-special-operation/


 

Le Pen accuses Macron of preparing ‘coup d’etat’


Western talk of Ukraine peace just for show – Moscow

Global confidence in Zelensky has ‘declined significantly’

 
1720000083037.png


1720000146383.png


1720000262683.png


1720000351693.png


1720000224309.png


1720000393213.png


1720000621143.png


1720000122026.png


1720000192354.png






During the disastrous Vietnam War, it was said that the US government treated the public like a mushroom farm: keeping it in the dark and feeding it with manure. The heroic Daniel Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers documenting the unrelenting U.S. government lying about the war in order to protect politicians who would be embarrassed by the truth. A half-century later, during the Ukraine War, the manure is piled even higher.

According to the U.S. government and the ever-obsequious New York Times, the Ukraine war was “unprovoked,” the Times’ favorite adjective to describe the war. Putin, allegedly mistaking himself for Peter the Great, invaded Ukraine to recreate the Russian Empire. Yet last week, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg committed a Washington gaffe, meaning that he accidently blurted out the truth.

In testimony to the European Union Parliament, Stoltenberg made clear that it was America’s relentless push to enlarge NATO to Ukraine that was the real cause of the war and why it continues today. Here are Stoltenberg’s revealing words:
 
Last edited:
Top