counter_violent
Legendary member
- Messages
- 12,669
- Likes
- 3,787
c_v,Ukraine ignoring Putler.
Well done Ukraine.
c_v,
If by some slim chance you're remotely interested in the reason why Zelensky is rejecting Putin's offer of diplomacy - then you need to read, mark, learn and inwardly digest every syllable of this latest offering from The Duran . . .
Oh dear c_v.Zelensky has no need to talk to Putler. None whatsoever. So that's that then.
Oh dear c_v.
Given our long history together on T2W, it's sad that you can't be bothered to watch the video before posting your comment.
In other words, "Rules for thee but not for me."I confess I rarely click on links you include in your posts
Russia pledged to uphold Ukraine's sovereignty in 1994. This was part of the Budapest Memorandum, where Ukraine, transitioning into an international order as a non-nuclear state, received security assurances¹. In this agreement, Russia, along with the U.S. and the U.K., pledged to respect the independence, sovereignty, and existing borders of Ukraine¹. They also agreed to refrain from the threat or use of force against Ukraine's territorial integrity or political independence¹. However, Russia's actions in recent years, including the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine, have been in violation of these commitments¹.
Source: Conversation with Bing, 9/16/2023
(1) Ukraine got a signed commitment in 1994 to ensure its security – but .... https://theconversation.com/ukraine...-and-allies-stop-putins-aggression-now-173481.
(2) Upholding Ukraine's Sovereignty in the Face of Russia's Aggression: A .... https://www.state.gov/briefings-for...sovereignty-in-the-face-of-russias-aggression.
(3) Secretary Antony J. Blinken And Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro .... https://www.state.gov/secretary-ant...mytro-kuleba-at-a-joint-press-availability-2/.
(4) Ukraine's forgotten security guarantee – DW – 12/05/2014. https://www.dw.com/en/ukraines-forgotten-security-guarantee-the-budapest-memorandum/a-18111097.
There have been several false statements from Russia regarding the war in Ukraine. Here are some examples:
1. **U.S. Biolabs in Ukraine**: Russia claimed that there are U.S. biolabs in Ukraine funded by the U.S. government¹. However, the labs in question are owned and funded by the Ukrainian government¹.
2. **Ukraine as the Largest Donor to the Clinton Foundation**: Russia claimed that Ukraine was the largest donor to the Clinton Foundation¹. However, Ukraine is not listed as a donor¹.
3. **Banning of the Rothschild Family**: Russia claimed that Vladimir Putin has banned the Rothschild family from entering Russia¹. However, there's no evidence supporting this claim¹.
4. **Sale of Alaska to Russia**: Russia claimed that President Joe Biden plans to sell Alaska to Russia¹. This claim is satire and stems from an article published by The Babylon Bee, a satire website¹.
5. **Ukraine as the Aggressor**: Russia claimed that Ukraine and Ukrainian government officials are the aggressor in the Russia-Ukraine relationship². However, false statements from the Putin regime blame the victim, Ukraine, for Russia’s aggression².
6. **The West Pushing Ukraine Toward a Conflict**: Russia claimed that The West is pushing Ukraine toward a conflict². However, Moscow instigated the current crisis by placing more than 100,000 troops on the border of Ukraine².
7. **Repositioning of Troops on Russian Territory**: Russia claimed that its deployment of combat forces is a mere repositioning of troops on its own territory². However, deploying more than 100,000 Russian troops to the borders of a country that Russia has previously invaded and still occupies in places is no mere troop rotation².
Please note that these are statements made by Russia and may not reflect the full reality of the situation. The conflict is complex and ongoing, and information should be interpreted with caution.
Source: Conversation with Bing, 9/16/2023
(1) Fact check: What's true and what's false about the invasion of Ukraine. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-and-whats-false-invasion-ukraine/6952717001/.
(2) Fact vs. Fiction: Russian Disinformation on Ukraine. https://www.state.gov/fact-vs-fiction-russian-disinformation-on-ukraine/.
(3) Fact check: Russia falsely blames Ukraine for starting war. https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-russia-falsely-blames-ukraine-for-starting-war/a-60999948.
(4) Fact check: Putin's claims justifying war in Ukraine are baseless .... https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...s-justifying-war-ukraine-baseless/7089270001/.
(5) Prigozhin Told the Truth About Putin’s War in Ukraine. https://theintercept.com/2023/07/01/prigozhin-truth-putin-war-ukraine/.
There were several false statements from Russia regarding their invasion of Georgia:
1. **Responsibility to Protect**: Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov claimed that by attacking Georgia, Russia was implementing a principle endorsed by the UN Security Council in 2006: the "responsibility to protect"¹. However, the most reliable independent reporting concluded that fewer than 100 civilians died during Georgia's initial incursion into the region¹.
2. **Accusation of Genocide**: Russia accused Georgia of committing genocide against South Ossetia¹³. This accusation was not supported by independent reporting¹.
3. **U.S. Orchestrating the Conflict**: Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin accused the U.S. of orchestrating the conflict in Georgia². However, these statements were labeled as "ludicrous" by U.S. State Department deputy spokesman Robert Wood².
4. **Invasion as Peace Enforcement**: Russia referred to its full-scale land, air, and sea invasion of Georgia as a "peace enforcement" operation³. This contradicts the fact that it was an invasion of another country's territory³.
Please note that these are statements made by Russia and may not reflect the full reality of the situation. The conflict was complex and information should be interpreted with caution.
Source: Conversation with Bing, 9/16/2023
(1) Russia's Poor Excuse For Invading Georgia - CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russias-poor-excuse-for-invading-georgia/.
(2) Russo-Georgian War - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russo-Georgian_War.
(3) Putin accuses U.S. of orchestrating Georgian war - CNN.com. https://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/08/28/russia.georgia.cold.war/index.html.
(4) International reaction to the Russo-Georgian War - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_reaction_to_the_Russo-Georgian_War.
R_L,In other words, "Rules for thee but not for me."
Brilliant argument. Stellar. Assuming you're not as insane as Zelensky and don't actually want WW3, that means you favour option 2, i.e. the continuing slaughter of ever younger and ever older Ukrainians, which will achieve precisely nothing other than perpetuating the war quite needlessly and increasing the risk of it turning nuclear. That's a great option - congratulations - you must be chuffed to bits with that. :-(A good reason for not negotiating with Russia is they haven't been truthful about too much regarding their invasions (see below). So, "this time it might be different" doesn't seem like a strong argument.
R_L,
Far from it. I gave extensive reasons why I didn't always view your links - so the circumstances are in no way comparable.
Brilliant argument. Stellar. Assuming you're not as insane as Zelensky and don't actually want WW3, that means you favour option 2, i.e. the continuing slaughter of ever younger and ever older Ukrainians, which will achieve precisely nothing other than perpetuating the war quite needlessly and increasing the risk of it turning nuclear. That's a great option - congratulations - you must be chuffed to bits with that. :-(
Tim.
As usual c_v, you have no answer to the points put to you. You say my position is "blatantly wrong headed", but don't provide a single shred of evidence to support the accusation. That's the norm from you, which is why I stopped contributing to the thread.I'm really starting to wonder about your state of mind tbh. The credibility and standing of your sources used to back up a blatantly wrong headed position on Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
He's 90% yours too, as 90% plus of what Brand says you agree with. It's only on the subject of Ukraine that you and he differ. You know full well it's a hit job on him because he's become huge, with a massive following, and threatens the corporate liberal elites. Yeah, that's the same corporate liberal elites who - in any other context - you have no time for and, like Brand, think are acting in their own best interests and not yours. C'mon c_v, you're better than this.This clown is one of yours.