What you are suggesting is if chemical poisons are Russian signature in assassinations then all chemical poisons are thus executed by Russians and Russians alone. This is about a simplistic setup as one can get. Well who else would do it if not the Russians? Let's just stop and think about this for one short second. It's so obvious. No brainer right? Much like 9/11, people see two aeroplanes crash into buildings but the story is 4 buildings are attacked, 2 aeroplanes fly into twin towers and we get two perfect demolitions. Apparently falling debri start fires in WTC 100 yards away and we get another perfect demolition supposedly by uncontrollable fires on 5 floors. Buildings fall at the speed of gravity. Finally, a 3rd aeroplane we never see crashes into the Pentagon and disintegrates. Is this possible? Do you believe all this sh1t?
Just take a moment and think about what you're saying, How on earth could a conspiracy on this scale firstly be executed and secondly, kept under wraps ? Its nothing less than preposterous, whatsmore downright insulting that America, A developed country would even contemplate killing its own innocent citizens, And for what reason ? stop watching rubbish on youtube,
Do you not see a case is being made to forge public opinion to carry out this act of aggression against UN and International Law?
I see people on TV say there is over-whelming evidence and simply carry on talking? Really???
I think without evidence we simply don't know who did what? Not saying we know who it was I'm simply stating the case Russians far too obvious to be culprit and too soon. Coupled with Trump wanting to pull out, his lawyer being searched and chemical attack on civilians when totally not necessary is simply making case and an overly strong case for action in Syria.
I do not believe in chain of coincidences. Especially when the World Cup is on in Russia and Syria just turning the corner with successes against rebels (notice they are not called terrorists. Similarly, in Latin America military governments and juntas and rebel factions financed by CIA were called guerrillas).
Older and wiser I now see all these labels and actions for what they are. 9/11 project axis of evil with Iraq, Syria and soon Iran continues. Pretty obvious to me.
I see US and UK as states sponsoring rebel armies as well as private ones like black ops civilian contractors as they are called for destabilising and achieving regime change. To say Syria or Iran sponsors terrorism and then conduct their policies as they do is total double standards.
Israel does not want a strong or rich Syria next door. It circumvents her policies to grab land and expand. Doesn't want any challenge to their appetite to dictate ME policies. US Israel EU the West in it purely for natural resources. Gas and Oil key input. He who has energy security and supply has wealth, dominance and influence.
Why doesn't the West taking moral ground do something about other dictators abusing their populations. Sudan, Zimbabwe or how about South Africa back in the 80s with Apartheid.
Why didn't these super powers first attack Sadam when he used chemical weapons on the Iranians gassing 00s of 000s when it looked like Iran was going to win?
Who supplied Sadam with chemicals and know how in the first place?
Did he have US UK consent?
Why was UK and US so sure he had chemical weapons when he'd destroyed them years ago. UK and US new he had chemical weapons coz they supplied them to him to halt Iranian advance in the good old days when he was in bed with CIA and MI6.
There is sooooo much spooky pooh it's pretty disgusting what goes on?
So forgive me but unless the evidence is there or parliament votes on it, I do not trust politicians or governments acting in the interest of people. Bliar and Bush are two recent names in point.
All the refugee stuff and devastated countries we see now are results of their agendas still in progress today.
In fact I wrote much about it at the time and I think Chilcot enquiry pretty much is a damning report on UK government at the time and Bliar's conduct. Don't forget both Robin Cook and Clare Short who were in the cabinet resigned over his lust for war. Two key insiders couldn't stomach the crap. Our political system doesn't support politicians or people of sound principal on the humanitarian scale does it? Look how Corbyn is treated. This is round two imo with Syria.
I'm just saddened you guys don't see it. Will not end well. I see it getting worse as Russia and China and other players not the push over Iraq or Sadam was.
Finally, if US does get dragged into a ME war again against Syria or Iran, I do see the dollar standard slipping away. UK and France have made a poor play too. Poor judgement, leads to bad decision, leading country in the wrong direction. No change there.
If you still have the interest this is write up for the case to go war back then.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2859189.stm
You can see why Theresa May would avoid it as UN and parliament would vote against it unless strong evidence is produced for reasons to go to war.
