Journal entries week-ending Jun-10th 2005
The 45 point S/R was doing well until the whipsawing on Friday afternoon cut the system to shreds.
Ditto the trailing-stop on the GBPUSD.
I may have to conclude that a mechanical system may not be as effective as I had originally thought.
There always has to be a man-in-the-loop, to make on-the-day judgements.
Whenever I take a 1-2-3 trade, it is always based on the volatiity, for example, and the conditions leading up to the 1-2-3 pattern.
Also, wouldnt take such as trade against the major trend. Nor would I take a trade near support/resistance, unless it reversed from the levels.
Perhaps trading is more of an art-form than I had originally thought.
Maybe, that isnt such a bad thing.
The worry, for me, is that depending on the day, I will use different indicators depending on the type of patterns.
I will rely more on oscilators when I perceive the market to be rangey, and MAs when I perceive the market to be trending. And here lies the rub. It is MY perception. This is something I cannot quantify.
Bearing in mind the above, I wonder how useful posting further trades would be, considering any such mechanical system may not be as profitable.
And also, if I cant put forward something that can be learnt, ie, easily transferable, would posts be merely egotistical look-at-me-making-money posts ? ( I hasten to add, that I am only break-even. This, in itself is a confidence-boost, as opposed to losing. )
In general, I think the S/R was a better system. It was both rangey ( take profits after a given move ), and trendy, ( let the trade run ). This allowed profits during rangey days, and also during trends.
I feel, that this version could be combined with more analysis to be bettered. eg; dont use arbitrary points. ( 45 pts ) etc.
But this merely brings me back to reading the market.
This can only come from experience.