- Digesting FOMC minutes, latest Trump policy moves and staff changes,
German Factory Orders and Draghi speech; awaiting Trump-Xi meeting,
Jobless Claims, ECB March minutes and French & Spanish auctions
- ECB minutes/Draghi speech: divisions on policy outlook all too clear,
Draghi speech suggests markets not mistaken in interpreting as less
accommodative outlook, even if no shift short-term
- FOMC minutes: balance sheet reduction timeline earlier than markets
expected, balance of risks on outlook clearly skewed to upside
- Trump: sequential setbacks and defeats on policy initiatives heightens
risk of precipitous 'for the win' move
- Table: Fed rate expectations by meeting
..........................................................................
********************
** EVENTS PREVIEW **
********************
Today will mostly be about the much anticipated and likely 'tense' meeting between the US and Chinese presidents, though the aftermath of the FOMC minutes along with German Factory Orders (largely as expected at 3,4% m/m after an upwardly revised slide of 6.8% in January), the 'account' of the ECB's March policy meeting and US weekly jobless claims will attempt to vie for markets' attention, as well as speeches from Draghi and SF Fed's Williams at the ECB conference. France and Spain top the day's run of govt bond sales. In respect of the ECB minutes, the level of more manifest dissent in recent meetings, which has previously typically glossed over, has been clear, and it will be interesting to see how the minutes spin what was a clear change of language in respect of policy and economic outlook risks, given many of the more dovish members have been trying to play down the significance in recent weeks, though the hawks are clearly in mood to back down on the need to discuss further tapering, if Weidmann's comments yesterday are anything to go by. Draghi's speech this morning (
http://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2017/html/sp170406.en.html) however makes it clear that the less accommodative signal from the March meeting was real. He concludes with "a reassessment of the current monetary policy stance is not warranted at this stage" but then adds "Before making any alterations to the components of our stance – interest rates, asset purchases and forward guidance – we still need to build sufficient confidence that inflation will indeed converge to our aim over a medium-term horizon, and will remain there even in less supportive monetary policy conditions." This makes it clear that the risks on the policy outlook are very clearly that they gradually move to a less accommodative stance.
** U.S.A. - March FOMC minutes **
- Financial markets' asymmetric view on central bank policies continues to be very noticeable, with many commentators spinning these minutes as 'dovish'. This despite the fact that they clearly state: "Most of the participants...anticipated that a change in that (reinvestment) policy would be appropriate before the end of this year". Markets had only been discounting this to start in 2018. As was also clear in the statement and Yellen's press conference, the FOMC sees as many, if not more upside risks to the economic outlook than downside risks, the latter in principle being limited to an overseas shock or an equity market meltdown and/or an accompanying tightening of financial market conditions, which will always be included as a matter of due diligence. This being the case, the balance of risks in terms of the policy trajectory are that there may be 3 rather than two further rate hikes, or if the USD strengthens considerably, they will drop or at the very least wind back reinvestment of existing Treasury and MBS holdings. The fact that 'some' members also suggested that the US equity market was looking rather overvalued should underscore the point that these minutes were not dovish. Be that as it may, markets naturally continue to be fixated on news flow related to the prospects for tax reform, infrastructure and of course Health Care reform, but will also need to be wary that after a run of defeats and setbacks to nearly all his policy initiatives that Trump's 'for the win' mentality could prompt a precipitous executive decision, wiht potentially very damaging consequences - eminently what would likely be a disastrous military engagement with North Korea is towards of that particular risk area.
from Marc Ostwald