Hotch
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,409
- Likes
- 256
He's not you know, because he put NOT in capitals![]()
I believe the official test is having a black friend.
He's not you know, because he put NOT in capitals![]()
That was the drunk barrister that had opened fire in a residential street in London if I remember correctly. Maybe they should have just shot the gun out of his hand like John Wayne used to do.
pboyles said:So what, I wonder, was this latest 'victim' going to do with that gun had he come across someone he thought was 'after' him. Wave it at them as a warning? I think you'll find that several people are alive today because he was taken out.
...and yes if you do have a gun in your possession illegally and are told to drop it then you run a high chance of being shot should you ignore the warning. Is there something wrong with that?
Are you on drugs ?
Which bit of the law says your allowed to carry a gun cos sum1 mite be after u innit !
Total nonsense.
The guy was carrying a gun because someone close to him had been stabbed?
Well that's what happens when you are in a gang of crack dealers isn't it? You reckon he wasn't carrying a gun before his crack dealing pimp mate got stabbed? Really? You buy that?
That has nothing to do with a law abiding citizen being able to protect his own home. Only a raving liberal would attempt to make that association.
The guy was scum. The only sad part is they didn't round up a few of his mates and do the same to them.
Saunders never shot anyone, he was shooting pigeons. He had a shotgun certificate, end of. It was just a public order offence, you don't kill someone it .
Er he was 'shooting pigeons' from the window of a house in Chelsea.
Er he was 'shooting pigeons' from the window of a house in Chelsea.
I said it is a natural right for a man to protect himself, not a legal one, the police can't be there every minute of every day.
I don't know much about the guy in question, but I do know how inefficient the police are and I do know the terror of being victimised by a gang in public. Whether he brought it on himself or not is another matter, if he did then, as I said before, f*** him.
And I don't see anything wrong with drugs or prostitution, so calling someone a crack dealing pimp doesn't really make them bad in my eyes. If his mate was just selling a product (be that women or crack cocaine) that people want, and he got killed, that's wrong. He may have been of low moral fibre but I don't see anything inherently wrong in selling drugs to people who wants drugs or providing prostitutes to those who want prostitutes.
Yes, we are not allowed to state the obvious.
At least there's a movie out now that should serve somewhat as a wake up call...
![]()
LMAO!
'providing' prostitutes. That's a new word for it. I presume getting a young gal hooked on heroin and then pimping her out is fine, right?
DionysusToast said:I also suppose that being involved in a trade that has caused thousands upon thousands of deaths in Columbia is OK too. Funding the Taliban? No problemo.
DionysusToast said:These people are scum.
DionysusToast said:You need to buy a new pair of glasses - see if they can cure your short sightedness.
And I don't see anything wrong with drugs ...........
........ I don't see anything inherently wrong in selling drugs to people who wants drugs
So I decide to carry a big stick to protect myself. I go out, and some feckless chav carrying a knife mugs me. Bollox, some feckin use that stick was, I'll get a kife.
Next day I go out brandishing my shiny new knife, and another feckless chav mugs me with a gun. Bugger, no feckin use carryin a knife, I'd better get me a gun.
Next day I go out totin me shooter, and I get mugged by a gang of chavs, with AK47's (cos they have be tooled up on account of every tom dick wot thay want to rob is carrying knives, chains, sticks and shooters these days FFS)
What the hell do I do then ? buy a rocket launcher, or fly around in a fully armed apache helicopter for christs sake on the odd chance I need to protect myself ?
the hare said:It might not escalate at the rate I suggest, but it does escalate, and its not really the solution. I might at a push agree that someone should be allowed to protect their home with firearms, but allowing people to walk the streets tooled up, sounds like a bad idea.
the hare said:I'm sure hoco will disagree with me, co he's always tooled up when he goes out, and noone ever gets shot where he lives.
the hare said:I've joked in the past that the way to prevent terrorism is to give everyone who gets on a plane a gun, and I still think thats not a bad idea, but I wouldnt want to roll the idea out on a wider scale.
Care to explain? I expected most people on this forum to be libertarians...I'm starting to se I was mistaken in that belief.
Again, buying some cocaine does not mean you killed anyone in Colombia, if they want to kill each then that is their business, no?
![]()
Care to explain? I expected most people on this forum to be libertarians...I'm starting to se I was mistaken in that belief.
I find it difficult to pigeon-hole myself using the standard terms (libertarian, conservative, frottage-enthusiast etc).
I am, broadly-speaking, a libertarian but at the same time I do not think that a single political philosophy, slavishly followed, can possibly adequately cope with the complexity of human existence.
Pazienza said:So I suppose I'm a limited libertarian. I'm also the guy that just took the NQ breakout and closed about 1 pt above the low. Meaning if you look in the dictionary there's a picture of me under "F***ing AWESOME, dude".