THT's Methods that WIN

Last post of the year - Its highly likely that I won't be posting much next year

The purpose of this thread was to open your eyes to what is happening in the markets, of which I'm confident I've done within the thread - The geometry of a market starts on the very first day of trading it has, these all fall more or less into a generic sequence which we can pick up by observing the main Index i.e. FTSE100/250, SP500 etc

I've not been able to post the Gann Box method that much - there's a lot of work needed to build the chart and to be frank, its just easier trading the other methods I've talked about because if the Gann Box method is in play - EVERYTHING about the simple other methods I have mentioned will HAPPEN, so you'd be trading them inadvertently! Remember you will NOT find this Gan Box method on every market at the same time - the market/price action HAS to be working to the gann box mathematics, they don't always do that, If you're forcing things, then I doubt the maths/geometry are present, if it fits nicely like below then price action is obviously working through maths and geometry that is visible to us/you

PS - I have NOT traded this - I let this one go as I was too busy travelling and trading forex and gold

LSE:ABF = WEEKLY Gann Box - levels should be self-explanatory (52.6% is the INVERSE of 1.902 = diagonal of a golden rectangle, so this is FIB growth/decay related - 70.7% is the INVERSE of 1.4142 = square root of 2 & the diagonal of a square)- Once complete reversal happen, this may also be exactly on a retracement level, but often just past or short, which explains why traders get frustrated at trading

Indicators perfect for the bounces - you can trade either the weekly chart of drop down a time-frame to the daily or hourly

1419.JPG


Daily:

This one allowed us to draw another Gann Box but using a different move than the weekly chart above

Study the daily chart - it has different % levels than the weekly chart, but they BOTH matched up at the same price point which is/was complimenting geometric levels/extensions

You could have traded the daily chart or dropped down etc

NOTE: Lots of "FIB" traders would have bought at the 38.2% retracement level, which when it happened was probably a pretty could trade call, but the market wasn't playing to that tune, it had to play to the tune showing on both charts

Now this might be the completion of that geometric move or it might not be, the market might just of needed to touch the levels on the daily chart in its journey - The bounce off the level has not been that convincing on a daily TF, but you just never know

Also note the % level this market might have turned from - its not a % level you know of, but you can see its the reverse of the 57.7% level (CUBE) and its an extending angle from the 57.7% main retracement level (CUBE)

If markets were truly random, we'd never have this structure forming - the facts are EVERYTHING in this world adheres to the laws of nature, growth and decay - absolutely EVERYTHING and that includes ourselves and the markets

1420.JPG

Wishing you all a Happy Christmas and Great 2025
 
Top