Terrorism????...Blame America!!!!

Gaza, Canada .... Who's next ? The UK ?​

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trump declares a national emergency on electricity and says Canada WILL become 'cherished' 51st state​

 

Murphy: Six Weeks In, This White House Is On Its Way To Being The Most Corrupt In U.S. History​


According to Perplexity:

Recent reports indicate that business leaders have been paying substantial amounts to meet with President Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate. A one-on-one meeting costs $5 million, while attending a candlelight dinner requires a $1 million reservation.

These events are organized by MAGA Inc., a super PAC supporting Trump’s 2024 campaign. The funds possibly contribute to Trump's future presidential library. Concerns are raised about the ethical implications of such fundraising and the potential influence bought by donors. These expensive dinners, unique in their timing, location, and cost, differ from traditional presidential fundraisers.

Specific advertisements promoting these meetings have not been publicly disclosed. However, the events have been covered in the media, highlighting the high costs associated with attending.

Additionally, reports indicate that wealthy business figures pay between $1 million and $5 million for various levels of access to President Trump at his Mar-a-Lago estate. The publication obtained access to an invitation revealing that Trump charges $5 million for private one-on-one meetings, while group dining events with the president cost attendees $1 million per seat.
thedeepdive.ca

These events have raised ethical concerns about the potential influence of donors on presidential decisions.
Wired

Why Trump’s meme coin is a cash grab
 
Last edited:

Profiting from war: USA is world's #1 arms dealer, exporting 7x more weapons than China, 5x Russia​


Why China wants to control much of the South China Sea​


How China’s ‘Salami Slicing’ Tactics Spark South China Sea Tensions | WSJ U.S. vs. China

Military Strategist Shows How China Would Likely Invade Taiwan | WSJ​

 
Last edited:

The special relationship at play​

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Met Police: 'You can protest for Israel but not for Palestine'​


Screenshot from 2025-03-14 07-27-47.png
 

US ally Israel unleashes 'fires of hell' in Gaza and warns Hamas will be shown 'no mercy' if hostages are not returned as IDF airstrikes 'kill 330 including terror chief' in dramatic end to ceasefire​

 

Trump's War Bomb DETONATES: Yemen's Missiles HIT Israel, IDF Attacks Gaza w/ Ben Norton​


According to Perplexity
In the case of Israel defaulting on bonds bought by U.S. citizens, the U.S. government does not automatically cover the bonds. The U.S. Sovereign Bond Guarantee (SBG) program, which has historically provided guarantees for loans to countries like Israel, Egypt, and Jordan, is not a blanket guarantee for all bonds issued by these countries. Instead, it applies to specific, U.S.-guaranteed sovereign bonds. For example, the 2017 U.S.-guaranteed Iraqi sovereign bond had a significantly lower interest rate due to the U.S. guarantee, but this does not extend to all bonds issued by Israel or other countries (1).

Israel Bonds, which are issued by the State of Israel and sold to U.S. citizens, are not covered by U.S. government guarantees. These bonds are governed by New York law, and in the event of a default, U.S. investors would have no recourse to the U.S. government for repayment (2) (4). The U.S. government’s role in such cases is limited to specific programs like the SBG, which require explicit authorization and are not applicable to all bonds issued by foreign governments (3).

Therefore, if Israel were to default on bonds purchased by U.S. citizens, the U.S. government would not step in to cover the losses unless the bonds were explicitly part of a U.S.-guaranteed program.
 
Last edited:
Zhang Sheng: Why Chinese Netizens Call Palestinian Fighters “Dandelions”
  • After October 7th, Israel’s embassy in China launched an aggressive campaign to sway public opinion—but it backfired.
  • From spreading misinformation about hostages to enlisting foreign embassies for support, their efforts only fueled stronger pro-Palestinian sentiment online.
  • Chinese citizens quickly exposed false claims, forcing Israeli and Western embassies to shut down their comment sections.
  • From Global Anti-Imperialism to the Dandelion Fighters, Zhang Sheng explores why China’s stance on Palestine remains firm and how young people are shaping the conversation.
 
Back
Top