hi ccclarette
your answer, as requested.
As a newbie trader you would do well to take advantage of the four thousand posts written by a truly expert trader.
No argument with that. I would, and shall.
Arrogant and patronising are perceptions. They are also emotive descriptions.
indeed they are. However, that doesn't invalidate the point. Perhaps you will allow me to restate it for greater clarity, and with your view incorporated.
"A rudimentary understanding of human nature would suggest that posting in such a manner that the readers
feel patronised and
perceive the poster as arrogant is likely to lead not to the professed desire to inform and educate, but to a strong and sometimes hostile response."
You asked why Socrates was ridiculed, and I replied. I stand by that assessment.
I wholeheartedly agree with your premise that "objective facts concerning an extremely demanding profession" are of far greater value than "vacuous generalities masquerading as helpful advice".
Are you thus suggesting that it is impossible to "offer objective facts from a position of personal success and expertise" in such a manner that the recipients don't "take it personally"? Or taken to its ludicrous conclusion, that anyone offering advice in such a way is ipso facto spouting "vacuous generalities"? My point remains that it must surely be possible to combine offering expert advice with an approach that takes account of the fact that you are dealing with other people, and with the frailties of ego that that of neccessity entails.
Moving on...
From a beginner, who has committed capital and is running multiple positions in markets she does not understand while seeking advice from unknown entities on a bulletin board...the irony is delicious.
There is no irony in my using that quote, ccclarette. I used it in direct reference to what seems to be your limited understanding of, and patience with, the vagaries of human nature, so again, I stand by it.
However, if you are suggesting that the same point can be made about myself and trading, then I freely concede it to be true. I do not claim, have not claimed, and am not now claiming, to have so much as scraped the surface of trading, and appreciate that it will be a very long time before I have, despite my current commitment to it. And yes, I have committed around 10 days' salary to a live account, and am running multiple positions of £10-£15 per trade. However, the "unknown entities", as you describe them, are fast becoming "better known", and I am very grateful to the ones that have taken the time, and the trouble, to help me further, both privately and in my journal. They know who they are, and that they have my heartfelt gratitude, respect and appreciation. ALL of them.
I will ask a question: what benefit, if any, is derived from running an unproven strategy with capital in a live market as opposed to testing a hypothesis in a simulation account?.
To answer this, I could refer you back to my journal, but instead I'll repeat what I said when I was asked this question once before.
There is no benefit. Because of the way I began my trading journey, I had a live account before I knew that such a thing as a simulation account existed. I fell for what has been described by another poster as "a slick marketing operation" which duly skinned its mark (me) and moved on, leaving me with the most rudimentary understanding of trading and a live account with beer money in (just £1,000). In light of the fact that that was my starting position I have let that continue, while committing no further funds and trying to learn what I can, treating it as a demo account.
regards
Tess