Mo
From the description you give I don't think you have a workable system at all. What you do have is something that gives you an important starting point - the trend direction - and I will accept, for the moment, that it is sufficiently robust to be accurate more often than not.
You are making assumptions, nothing wrong with that but if you had the full details of my system I think you may change your mind. Before you ask the answer is No - not that I am averse to making punters aware of how I do it but I am very much against giving the opposition (Spread Betting Company's) any further advantage to what they already have.
From then on you are in discretionary mode for your actual trading, deciding when to enter and what profit to take or what loss (none, it seems, other than the occasions when your account is wiped out), with all the vagaries that are associated with that.
Half and half. In addition to the trend detector I apply further criteria in an attempt to achieve 'best timing'. It is the closing deal where I use my discretion.
You said in your earlier post that you should have taken 12 points profit when it came at one stage. Hand on heart now, would you really have taken it do you think, or would you have stayed in on the basis that your judgement or system signal was eventually coming right? Or maybe you would have earlier breathed a sigh of relief and closed it at break even?
Hand on heart I can say I would have taken the 12 points because it would have given me an edge (ie a £120 profit) on further daily bets. I do NOT restrict my trades to one a day; if I can get in and out with small profits then I will do it. The trend indicator is primary, secondary is an indicator(s) as to when to place the bet. For example, if the trend indicator suggests going Short at a certain level (given as a number) in the index, and the index goes in the opposite direction for x points then, to my mind, that suggests a better opportunity to make a Short trade than the initial indicator gives. Sorry, but that is as much as I can reveal without giving the full system. Hope this makes sense.
Even if you can hand on heart say you would have taken it at that stage, it would still be a piddling return in relation to the risk you were running. You're an accountant and must be pretty familiar with risk and return analysis - what risk would you advise your clients to run for a return of £120?
I understand risk and return analysis and I deliberately ignore this (stupid or what!). When I said in earlier answers that I do not use stop losses I could have added that my view is to find a system that makes a consistent profit and whether or not it complies with conventional criteria is immaterial to me. If I fall on my face so be it.
Mobanded