mark120169
Senior member
- Messages
- 3,116
- Likes
- 20
Not really sure what you are getting so excited about Mark model 120169. This looked indecisive to me and I did not trade it. And, in the many months I've been trading net trap, this is the first time I've seen a difference between my results and the official results. No biggee - there are humans involved and everyone has their own view.
I'm not sure how you can describe the system as "performing badly". Drawdown months are just a fact of life when trading. And with the hit rate of this method, back to back losses are guaranteed.
Rather then getting "really pissed", just accept responsibility for your own trading. Not much point getting pissed at RH 'cause he avoided a loss. No one is putting a gun to your head to trade....
But that's rubbish. Please read the "buy signals text" under chart on page 16 of the book. Everything to give a clear buy signal as explained in the book is in fridays MA figures. Please explain to me why it is indecisive. Without involving the end two decimals (which the book says only I use asthey report it as 15001.04 rather than 1.5001).
This is what upsets me, the rules are clear, but I feel he has deliberately twisted his rules to avoid the worse week ever and to try and limit the worse month ever. i don't care that I took the loss, I did what the rules said.
But obviously someone with loads of forex experience can say "na, no trade to risky" just my knowing the market. I can't, that's why I trade NT. But it grates when the guy who invented the rules doe not trade them. If he has more complex sub rules for days the MA is mot clear buy 2 or more he should say what those rules are.
M