Hilarymannah
Well-known member
- Messages
- 467
- Likes
- 52
As I stated before,..most folk only see dots,.....
http://www.vision3d.com/sghidden/images_sghidden/dino.jpeg
http://www.vision3d.com/sghidden/images_sghidden/dino.jpeg
As I stated before,..most folk only see dots,.....
http://www.vision3d.com/sghidden/images_sghidden/dino.jpeg
As you have done this, can you see what the difference is between your version of random entry and the one in the passage ?
As for your results, and understand that this is not an insult but I do not believe that you have proved that a random entry can be profitable.In my opinion, there are some immutable laws of mathematics (and some would say physics) that you have to overcome to make it work. More than likely you have seen positive results over a relatively short number of trades and suffered from confirmation bias to take the results to mean that random entry + mm = profit.
Unless you will pull out the "my methods are secret" card, I would like to see the details so we can see if certain natural bias may have affected your work.
There is one way random entry will work. You flip a coin, enter the market and then exit any trade you would not have taken yourself. For instance, you may be in an obvious uptrend, get a short trade, enter and exit. This is not money management, this is discretionary trading, by exiting after entry you are effectively not taking the trade. In a nutshell, it's cheating.
Hi Markus,You're nothing but a charlatan posting endless drivel about random entries not working, technical analysis not working, yada yada, to which I keep providing ample evidence that totally clearly disputes your BS.
Another classic piece of Toasted BS completely unfounded conjectural BS with absolutely no other purpose than trying to impress entirely clueless and gullible newbies with nothing but hot air:
I'm just relating to you the way a pro trades without using the tools we deem essential to the task of trading - like charts for instance.
Yeah right pros don't use charts LMAO, anymore than Baha as per Toasts narrowminded view of things also wouldn't be using technical analysis and indicators in his 1.5 billion fund lol !
Listening to seminar taking charlatans like Toast and The Expert is seriously bad for your financial health.
Tim to me DT and Socrates and The Expert are all of the same flesh, substance free posers who are entirely clueless and come up with seriously misleading crap like TA not working - heck I keep posting evidence to the contrary and Toast is just in total denial - or "pros" not using charts etc as per my post above yours:
Mr Gecko, it isn't just random entry and money management. It is random entry plus exit criteria plus money management. And that can give you an edge. Why not?