Take a guess at the number of brokers who have gone tit's up over the last 25 years because someone who was catagorised as "he's OK, he's good for the money" turned out er . . . not to be .
Many stockbroker mergers in 1988 (possibly the majority iirc) took place because of client defaults over the 1987 crash.
I really not having a pop here, but pointing out the reality of running a brokerage in this day and age.
Dashing - Im guessing you were or are a broker? I also take your comments in good faith and that you are not having a pop!
Yep I totally get it, its not about the money for me, it was the fact that I had a stop in place, the stop was within limits, it wasnt hit and the trade went to profit.
The problem with being pissed on matters of "principle" is you cannot win, at the end of the day as a customer I felt hard done by Prospreads and will vote with my feet.
I will also take every opportunity to pass on my experiance to anyone willing to listen, on this and any other forum I use. Its amazing the power of a few negative comments can have on placing doubt in the minds of potential clients. I will respond with my experiance to every post or question I see from users soliciting comments about prospreads.
I wished someone had placed such doubts with me. Yes Im bitter and no doubt I will wake up tommorrow feeling less fragile about this.
I did have an issue with IG index over £thousands a while back who despite being large and unpersonable managed the complaint so diffrently, I can say that they kept me as a customer and made me feel valued (and have made back many times more than they spent putting my complaint right). I even received a call from one of the IGIndex directors. I also made a point of posting the fact that I was very happy with the outcome.
When im wrong Im wrong but when you are devalued as a customer there are only a few options open to you to be heard - this is one of them. Yes you do leave yourself open to ridicule and to berated as an underfunded idiot, I however know the circumstances. Prospreads know the facts in the matter, they know the funding turnaround on my account and they know that their actions may have been premature, thats what matters. If it was a 10 lot trade I may actuall get it from their perspective, its the fact that it was a 1 lot with plenty of breathing space on a high threwput account.
To say they acted within their terms is no defence - in fact if we used that as our bible we would never trade as they have the right to close a trade at any point if you are winning or loseing.
It is important to share bad experiances like this, as its only on matters of discretionary decisions that a company can really be judged. At the end of the day business is business and in my opinion Prospreads called it wrong on this occasion.
I do appreciate your comments, they are very valid, at least you care enough to reply