A Dashing Blade
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,373
- Likes
- 170
Stop trolling Jack
Stop trolling Jack
Your intial premise is factually incorrect therefore the question you postulate is irrelevent
JackBeg to differ. It's been established that they're not automatically hedging in the underlying market, so I can't see why they need to use lot based trade sizes now. Isn't that why they reduced their minimum deposit and margins to be more in line with 'normal' spread bets? It would be good to have some clarification from the LCG horse's mouth, though.
Also i have been trying to keep out of the chat regarding the S&P stop, all i am going to say about the matter is that the person with the problem is not giving the correct information. ( client Confidentiality )
Its a a fact that what happened to me IMHO was incorrect,
You're the only one who can state here what you say and what they say, so we can make our own minds up. I'm interested for one.
If your main claim is that they could have exercised discretion because you're a good customer, the converse is that they may have acted fast to potentially save losses. If it's the cancellation on disconnect thing, then I agree it's a pain, but it's all automatic? and their main obligation should be to make it clear in the docs what happens.
Jack
The prices or data shown on the trading platform is actual market prices, anybody out there testing against other non SB platforms will clarify this. The reason for reducing initial deposit is that people like to test the platform, before depositing larger amounts.
The £1000 initial deposit does this.( client Confidentiality )
Xeno
There is an argument for what they did, again never disputed.
And what is that argument? You say later that they state a margin, and then use some different figure. That implies they were in the wrong, but you clearly can see why they did what they did. It's just I can't ;-)
You HAVE checked out what exchange minimum requirements are havn't you Jack <cough!> :whistling. . . wouldn't the initial deposit and margins have to equal those required for futures?
If it were my software I'd be matching in-house orders for a start . . .. . .
The only debate which needs clarifying in this thread as far as I can see is if their is any circumstance under which prospreads clients orders are NOT executed in the market.
Its a really stupid amount of money £350, its the principle of what they did and the way it has been handled from a customer service perspective all this with total lack of communication.
You HAVE checked out what exchange minimum requirements are havn't you Jack <cough!> :whistling
There's nothing more to be said really.