That's not conversion - that's immigration.
Yes I agree. Islam, like Christianity is a n old religion so it already has a large population.
Along with the immigration i think the breeding patterns from the islamic part of the world help increase these figures.
In terms of conversions, this is only my opinion, there are more Christian conversions than Islamic conversions. I think in the modern world this would have a lot to do with the way leadership is perceived. In the middle east, most are already Islamic, so few conversions there. In the west, where I think most conversions are likely to happen, Christianity has a more organised image. The way the west functions as a society is far more preferable and acceptable than most asian countries where religion is harped on about but basic human values are lacking .
I think the events of the last few decades involving Islamic fundamentalism and media coverage has given Islam an extreme image. Although this is not the principles that Islam has been built upon, it has certainly been hijacked by its hierarchy, which really doesn't seem to have a moral direction, rather a political motive.
I don't understand how any hierarchy that permits Fatwa, and has been quiet regarding the terrorist activities associated with Islam, can be seen to be responsible in its leadership of millions. I know many are against what is going on, but you never hear the men at the top condoning these activities in public.
A clear example was the Fatwa on Salman Rushdie, now what the hell was all that about. Understandably he may have misquoted something, but if the leaders have an approach that says kill anyone that does this, then what about the lower levels who cannot think as clearly, there actions are likely to be worse and will tarnish the image of the religion.
It seems or appears that these leaders act on impulses initiated by an onset of anger about something. The religion itself may not be the problem, but the leadership may have to be changed.