Atilla
Legendary member
- Messages
- 20,848
- Likes
- 4,028
A lot of you have pretty much said the same thing to my reply, so I'll reply here once:
It's true - education and smartness aren't perfectly positively correlated. However, I can guarantee you that if you check out the educational qualifications of all the FTSE 100 CEOs, a majority of them will be highly educated. This is no mere coincidence. Getting higher education from top institutions does require smartness. It's this smartness that makes these guys/girls reach the top. The education doesn't make them smart - they already were smart.
I used to work at an investment bank part-time and most people there would come in the morning and leave in the evening. There was one individual, however, who would often arrive earlier and stay later than most. He rarely went out for lunch, instead sat on his table while eating. It's been a couple of years since then but I talked to him a while back and now he's been promoted several times and has all the perks to go with a nicer job title. So, while everyone was doing the same thing day-in day-out, this guy was really pushing himself (hence the "blood, sweat, and tears" remark).
Most of the people who get to the top with pure hard work deserve higher pay. No doubt though, some pay is far too excessive.
Fair cop Amit,
No doubt there are exceptional individuals in all areas.
Having reached the top - what is the performance indicator and benchmark for these individuals now called management.
Productivity and return on investment must be baselined and measures in some way.
How would you measure output and productivity?
Is it based on input - hours worked - profits made - share price.
What is the yard stick. Blood sweat and tears indeed. Is the sweat of the janitor worth less than COE's on the squash court...
How would you correlate salaries of COEs against share price performance in contrast to university degrees?