rsh01
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,184
- Likes
- 299
... I think you got my point![]()
its hard to when you're changing your statements
The outcome of each individual hand/trade is very much dependent on luck
i will use 'very much', not 'completely'....the outcome of the cards dealt in a hand of poker (any card game) is entirely dependent on luck - just like it is with flipping a coin - but you're talking about the outcome of the hand i.e. who wins it....which has v little to do with luck - good or bad.
daniel negraneau once mentioned that he could beat a group of crap poker players playing blind. he is removing the element of luck from his play - the cards, to level the playing field a little, and using his skill, experience etc to define the outcome. i agree - he will lose some hands, and i agree this could be down to bad luck.... it could also be down to a good bit of skill from a newbie who happens to be good at arithmetic, has just read harringtons books & took a course on body language / the art of deception. whatever - the outcome of each hand is very much dependent on a few factors, more often than not, in this hypothetical example it would be on negraneau's skill. it would be an interesting experiment.