mathsfreak
Junior member
- Messages
- 22
- Likes
- 1
By way of example, would we accept Newton’s view of the universe or the Church’s? Is your belief system based on science or the supernatural?
Excepting the last sentence, perhaps you could give an example of evidence dismissed because it is “too strange”. Are you talking of evidence or simply conjecture?
“Lack of evidence is not evidence” What do you mean by this?
Are you a maths grad?
Grant.
First question, I am influenced by science and religion as I think that they are complementary-despite the fact that there are some theories and ideas that do oppose each other. My ideas of what might be true are not limited to current scientific knowledge. I am willing to at least consider any strange tale although of course I realise there is a lot of stuff out there that is just crazy.
About evidence being strange, well sometimes the evidence might be dismissed because it is just some persons story. But I think if a person told a story about something normal everybody would believe them. Like I have often heaard stories about people who have claimed that serious diseases just went away overnight. Now there may be a 'natural' explanation or a not so natural one but often doctors refuse to believe it was anything supernatural.
As to lack of evidence, I just mean that something might be true but that the evidence is scarce so no one has found it yet. Like when they found this fish that they assumed had become extinct millions of years ago and then they suddenly found one (alive). The lack of previous evidence drew them to the conclusion that it didnt exist any more when in fact it did.
And no, sadly I am not a maths grad-I did econ but I love maths because it is so intriguing