FetteredChinos
Veteren member
- Messages
- 3,897
- Likes
- 40
trendie, i think she was using an MA of 9 for the Bollingers... it seems consistent with the MA in the middle of the BB's
chump said:Jilly,
What was the size of the sample set you got from the Dow over that 2 year period ?
..and shh ..I don't know what you mean about other thread ..as far as I can see two people were in an acholic stupour talking to each other about me ..but I was never there
chump said:Jilly,
Do you have enough data to run that test over a 5 year period say 99 - 04 ?
chump said:Jilly,
What I am getting at is the two years you have used and the size of your sample set may not be robust enough to rely on...a longer period for your test that embraces a full set of market phenomea would also generate a larger sample set for you to 'rely' on with 'confidence' ..just a thought .
frugi said:Forgive my intrusion but Fettered mentioned having a crack at 123s. I don't know if this is any use to anyone but as you know I'm a big furry fan of them and I'm working on a longer timescale small stakes strat for my wife's SB account. (Eek there goes our holiday money lol)
The basic rules are in the attachment. Not too happy with the 2:1 risk:reward but it does have a high strike rate. Basically a tweak of the strat I use on a shorter timeframe which does work as long as you cherry pick the 123s. Yeah big caveat I know. Please feel free to work some Chinos / Jilly / Chumpy / trendie et al magic on it! I'm in this trade at the moment fwiw. Will be interested to see how it pans out.
Am tempted to split the position into 4 and then take 15 points on the first, 30 on the next two and let one run. Hmmm....
Anyway sorry to get in the way. Best get back to work or Sharky will dock my wages.
frugi said:The same David who was eager to complete the jigsaw advertised on the front of his Frosties packet but gave up after several hours when the orange sugar coated pieces didn't seem to fit together properly innit.