chrisw said:
one for the old school traditionalist....
www.chartpatterns.com
Uphios was under the impression the Ascending Triangle was
only reliable in an up trend.
(Bearing in mind, nothing is ever totally reliable...).
An ascending Triangle is normally considered Bullish, wherever it occurs.
If it occurs as a pause in an up trend there is a high probability of continuation BUT...
When it occurs in a down trend it can also serve as a reversal pattern and serve as an initiator of an up trend. In the context of today's action on Cable - that was, I felt, the higher probability.
It is important to consider the wider implications of any chart pattern, not just the more commonly accepted ones. It's easier to say 'this only applies this way in this situation', and it does take more work to consider each formation in whatever context it appears. But the benefits are that you get to educate yourself more fully in the process.
I'm really not preaching - there are others that do that so much better than me
😆 , but these traditional chartist patterns exist for good reason. They play themselves out time and time again because people (traders) do the same thing time and time again.
I find the more contemporary chart patterns books are the worst in attempting sterilise patterns into narrower and narrower prescriptive modes. If you're lucky enough to get hold of some of the old tomes on the subject, they were a little (a lot actually!) broader in their scope and appreciation.
Can I go back to my hut now?