While trendlines are a vital aspect of TA it's the first time I've seen them referred to as a 'leading' indicator.ottos said:To all who were referring to my post about trendlines.
You are right if trendlines are used in traditional way, however after studying it and getting mentored about using them as leading indicator , I now believe that trendlines are the the best leading indicator I know about .
What I've meant was that trendlines can show you where the price is going and where is most likely spot for price reversal ahead of time .TheBramble said:While trendlines are a vital aspect of TA it's the first time I've seen them referred to as a 'leading' indicator.
The indicator provides guidance to potential future price, but to ascribe 'leading' is I feel erroneous, unless you have information outside the ken of most traders who use them.
A lagging indicator is 100% correct in it's re-presentation (delib. punc.) of what has happened.
A 'leading' indicator (if such a term is used) would imply 100% correctness in what was about to happen.
It does indeed; because that's what it is, really. A moving average is a moving trendline.Splitlink said:an ma does illustrate the trend well ...
Who indeed? An average _is_ a trendline, but in my language that doesn't make either of them "leading indicators"!Splitlink said:However, with an average line like this, who needs trendlines?
ottos said:To all who were referring to my post about trendlines.
You are right if trendlines are used in traditional way, however after studying it and getting mentored about using them as leading indicator , I now believe that trendlines are the the best leading indicator I know about .
RUDEBOY said:Does anybody here trade price only?
I will explain more when I have time.Splitlink said:I think some trade just by reading the ticker. I'm not that confident, I use a chart but no indicators
or volume except a longterm average for trend. Socrates will probably say that I don't even need that but I'm not that far ahead, yet!
Split
Right on the button ! I will explain in due course, when I have time, wife calling....RUDEBOY said:Just only ever reading ticker, i would have thought you would have to be like Dustin Hoffman in Rainman.
yesRUDEBOY said:Does anybody here trade price only?
I follow that entirely, Brambly One, but in my mind there's possibly some circularity in Goslin's argument, because it seems to me that he's inferring that the price will go up because the average goes up, whereas in reality the average will only go up because (if) the price has gone up. However, it's late and I'm more tired than usual and I concede that I may not be doing him justice, and I may not be doing you justice, and I may not even be doing DB justice (but he's probably used to that).