TheBramble
Legendary member
- Messages
- 8,394
- Likes
- 1,170
TheBramble said:
Cracked me up.
TheBramble said:Sorry mate. I thought you were being funny.
Price action doesn't 'work' - it just 'is'.
Interpreting it in conjunction with volume (or volume proxy) and time doesn't always 'work'. But I have a suspicion that working with the bare essentials takes you off down fewer false trails than ANY indicator based system. I have no basis, nor the will to provide any, for backing up that statement.
And no, my track record is just a tad shy of 100%...
Nice one WASP, keep at it then, sounds like its working and making money so stick with it if your happy doing so.wasp said:Well, since my indicators (for cable) signalled a long at 7.15 on the nose before it started to shoot up and I am still running (albeit with a tight trailing stop now) whilst nearly all on the cable thread have been shorting at various points up, I guess that answers my question.
Waspwasp said:Well, since my indicators (for cable) signalled a long at 7.15 on the nose before it started to shoot up and I am still running (albeit with a tight trailing stop now) whilst nearly all on the cable thread have been shorting at various points up, I guess that answers my question.
You have listened to our views and concluded that you are happy with your method and it is working for you, so I think you have succeeded in casting our any doubts you had at the time of the first posting.wasp said:For a newbie learner, I am torn between making a profit although smaller than could be (lagging indicator) and using none at all and generally getting it wrong far more than I do with indicators.
Just because indicators can be lagging (sometimes they can be spot on), if making a profit with them, why shouldn't they be used. I know its all down to personal preferance but there is so much talk of price action being the 'right' way, Id be interested in others views
Charlton said:Wasp
It seems the thread has completed the circle.
Well that's no bleedin' good for me they're my golf days!
Still trading currency eh - one step away from being a money lender. Be careful!
My biscuit method works everyday!!!
New research shows that digestives may not be the best trading indicator!
Just make sure you have got the correct biscuit and settings, for all you dunking traders.
http://www.null-hypothesis.co.uk/science/spoof/articles/dunking_biscuits_cup_tea_long
"Figure 2 clearly shows that digestives cannot be trusted with hot beverages."
Ah very true but you also need to access the COT (coagulation of the tea) data.
As with many successful systems there is always an element that cannot be defined
What if was to tell you that the most successful temperature for the tea is around 61.8 degrees.
Wait for the tea to cool down before dunking the biscuit and pay attention to COT.
To use or no to use.........
On the one hand I have a method that uses indicators which albeit are lagging, produce more winners than losers and with tightish stops, more points won than lost, which, with correct money management, produces a profit.
On the other, price action is what all the threads lead to and many veteran posters profess as the only way...
Then on one thread someones consistently profitable using MA's and CCI and VWAP and I've seen it here and there saying some pro's have RSI, stochs and MA's on board and even on Bloomberg and many other 'pro' sites state certain MA's as relevant.
For a newbie learner, I am torn between making a profit although smaller than could be (lagging indicator) and using none at all and generally getting it wrong far more than I do with indicators.
Just because indicators can be lagging (sometimes they can be spot on), if making a profit with them, why shouldn't they be used. I know its all down to personal preferance but there is so much talk of price action being the 'right' way, Id be interested in others views.