Sir Pond Life Dreg
Active member
- Messages
- 135
- Likes
- 126
I think he used to post statements, but everyone just called 'photoshop!'.
)
Yeah but we still have BeginnerJoe on thesevery here boards, don't we
Try n get one past him
I think he used to post statements, but everyone just called 'photoshop!'.
)
5. Lastly, here's an acid test to apply to any post made by any vendor on any forum on the web. Having read the post(s) of the vendor that you find unacceptable, ask yourself this question: 'Would the post(s) become acceptable if they were posted by a non-vendor?' If the answer is 'yes', then chances are that your issue is likely (not all the time or every time) to be with the messenger and not with the message. T2W will be a better forum, the content will be better - and we will all get along much better - if we all consciously focus on the message and not on the messenger!
Tim.
It may not be acceptable to you - and that's fine - but it's perfectly acceptable to me and to T2W, as there's nothing in either the Community Constitution or the Site Guidelines that rules against it. Any member that shares your views can take the very sound advice offered by Purple Brain and vote with their mouse and click on a different thread - one to their liking. Leave this thread and others like it to those that think it has value.Fair points but posting "after the event" setups and calls isn't acceptable from anyone vendor or not , it proves nothing and it's worthless to say the least. . .
As a former Mod you'll know better than me – so please correct me if I’m wrong – but my understanding is that the OP of the thread you link to was banned and his thread closed not because of the 20 min’ delay in his calls – but because of what Mods refer to as ‘Ad-ish posting’? If Mr. C’ behaved in this way then, presumably, he could expect a similar fate. If Mods put Mr. C’ in the same bracket as the banned member then, at the very least, one would expect to see Mr. C’s posts edited or deleted and infraction points awarded. This doesn’t appear to have happened. If you and others feel the Mods aren’t doing what you’d expect, please see point No. 2 in my last post. IMO, the reason I suspect the Mods don’t take any action against Mr. C' is twofold. Firstly, Mr. C’ is not in breach of any of the site guidelines and, secondly, the methodology outlined here is self contained and provided completely free of charge. Of course, members can still lose money attempting to trade the methodology described, but not a cent of it will end up in Mr. C's pocket.. . .the other day everyone jumped over a vendor because of a 20 min delay in his calls , now the thread is closed and member banned which is good
Hi tar,
It may not be acceptable to you - and that's fine - but it's perfectly acceptable to me and to T2W, as there's nothing in either the Community Constitution or the Site Guidelines that rules against it. Any member that shares your views can take the very sound advice offered by Purple Brain and vote with their mouse and click on a different thread - one to their liking. Leave this thread and others like it to those that think it has value.
As a former Mod you'll know better than me – so please correct me if I’m wrong – but my understanding is that the OP of the thread you link to was banned and his thread closed not because of the 20 min’ delay in his calls – but because of what Mods refer to as ‘Ad-ish posting’? If Mr. C’ behaved in this way then, presumably, he could expect a similar fate. If Mods put Mr. C’ in the same bracket as the banned member then, at the very least, one would expect to see Mr. C’s posts edited or deleted and infraction points awarded. This doesn’t appear to have happened. If you and others feel the Mods aren’t doing what you’d expect, please see point No. 2 in my last post. IMO, the reason I suspect the Mods don’t take any action against Mr. C' is twofold. Firstly, Mr. C’ is not in breach of any of the site guidelines and, secondly, the methodology outlined here is self contained and provided completely free of charge. Of course, members can still lose money attempting to trade the methodology described, but not a cent of it will end up in Mr. C's pocket.
Tim.
how the **** are you supposed to make live calls while trading on 1M charts
Hi Tim you didn't get my points i am sorry my fault , when i said it isn't acceptable i didn't mean it is a breach of T2W site guidelines nor i implied that mods didn't take action here - i was a mod and i didn't take action here either - or MR C should be banned or his thread deleted , no , i'm just pointing out that posting these calls isn't acceptable in the trading industry because it is done in hindsight so it proves nothing and it means nothing , and yes Kevo was banned because of his adish posting i am aware of that but the point was members didn't give him a break and didn't leave him alone when he posted "after the event" calls , i'm just trying to make a comparison here , bottom line each to their own and constructive criticism should be acceptable in this thread like in other threads as well .
It's not even relevant if he makes money off the method. Even if he was making 6 figures a day, doesn't mean someone else could emulate it.
The method is so simple, I don't see why someone wouldn't just try it and see if it works for them and adapt it to the personality.
All the complaining is for nothing.
If you really wanted proof of whether/not it works why not start a journal and show us what happens when you do try and trade it? Everyone's happy to chuck some rocks but no one will spend five minutes trying to find their own proof.
I agree with the point highlighted in blue and I suspect Mr. C' would agree with it too. But I also believe that live calls are equally meaningless and prove nothing other than that the member who posts them may make or lose money trading their methodology. However, it doesn't mean that I'll be able to trade it! All I care about and, I wager, all any member cares about, is whether or not a particular methodology will work for me. And there's only one way to find out. When I place my trade, the market doesn't care two hoots that the methodology I'm trying to emulate is based on live calls, hindsight calls or any other type of calls! Therefore, with the obvious exception of a vendor providing a signals service, for my money there's nothing inherently better, more meaningful or acceptable about trades called live than there is about ones posted in hindsight.. . . i'm just pointing out that posting these calls isn't acceptable in the trading industry because it is done in hindsight so it proves nothing and it means nothing . . .
There is no issue here at all. If his calls are not live, then people can't copy them anyway!
I'd be more concurred by a vendor actually trying to push live copy cat calls to people on this site
There is no problem with people announcing what open positions they have. Thats part of the fan!
On probably the worst day to 'demo' anything.
On probably the worst day to 'demo' anything.