GREY1 P/L daily

moreagr said:
Nas,

thank you for your response!

yes i have listened to grey1's paltalk sessions and find them of real value but was wondering how you approached your strategy regarding vwap deviations.

only problem is i am still using quotetracker which does not have on the filtering and alerting capabilities that TS has.
moreagr,

I approach the VWAP strategy with caution, since I don’t have the appropriate code, and lack complete confidence without more experience. So I definitely only attempt to enter this style when the market is not showing too much strength, while the Dow is in favor of the stock’s direction, is stronger than Dow, is showing unique strength/weakness, & without any news. Therefore when I see an opportunity that meets these minimal req’mnts, I’ll use the basic formula in excel to see where the MPD risk band would be. I have noticed though, that a very quick guestimate of where the MPD band would be, prior to using excel (listed in post # 591), is at the Hi/Lo of the Day – if the time of trade is early, and where if this would be the 1st Hi/Lo of the day. Then I’d use the VWAP manual formula to verify.. It will just take practice and experience, that is all – paper trade it.

As for your platform, I’d recommend obtaining a professional trading platform. This market is difficult enough to trade against the MM’s and specialists who have the deep pockets to move a stock or even markets. I don’t know how anyone could compete with them without the appropriate trading tools, discipline, and experience.
Nas
 
This market is difficult enough to trade against the MM’s and specialists who have the deep pockets to move a stock or even markets.

Nas,

In my view this only really applies when either the market is quiet or there is low liquidity. If there is strong volume then it doesnt matter how deep the pockets of a MM are as they will get stung badly if they try and move a market because strong volume will counter act artificial moves. The opposite is true for markets with low volume or when trading is quiet at around lunchtimes. In many ways a strong market is great for trading especially if you are using appropriate oscillators at OB or OS levels with stocks near their high or low of the day.

AAPL was a great example of this on Friday when INDU went OS, AAPL was close to its high of the day and gave a nice 40c up move before giving an exhaustion signal. It actually went up another 9c but 40c is good enough for me.


Paul
 
Last edited:
Nastrader said:
moreagr,

I approach the VWAP strategy with caution, since I don’t have the appropriate code, and lack complete confidence without more experience. So I definitely only attempt to enter this style when the market is not showing too much strength, while the Dow is in favor of the stock’s direction, is stronger than Dow, is showing unique strength/weakness, & without any news. Therefore when I see an opportunity that meets these minimal req’mnts, I’ll use the basic formula in excel to see where the MPD risk band would be. I have noticed though, that a very quick guestimate of where the MPD band would be, prior to using excel (listed in post # 591), is at the Hi/Lo of the Day – if the time of trade is early, and where if this would be the 1st Hi/Lo of the day. Then I’d use the VWAP manual formula to verify.. It will just take practice and experience, that is all – paper trade it.

As for your platform, I’d recommend obtaining a professional trading platform. This market is difficult enough to trade against the MM’s and specialists who have the deep pockets to move a stock or even markets. I don’t know how anyone could compete with them without the appropriate trading tools, discipline, and experience.
Nas

Hi Naz

Thanks for your posts which I find helpful.

Could you tell me something: do you use a "Darvas" based technique in your trading?

Thanks Again

Steve
 
samtron said:
Cheers Nas,
I also try implement a similiar rationale to the one that you excently decribed above; but I have found that gappers can distort the picture, (ie a stock gaps up say 7% :eek: but then sells off slowly, will allways appear near the top of the %change column ), have you found and easy way to cater for these?

PS made a profit on my overnight BRCM trade (more luck than judgement :) ) the stock was very active in the post market the evening I bought).
LOL Samtron,

Congrates on your BRCM trade, very glad it was profitable (luck was with you). BRCM was all over the place in AH on the 19th, and calmed down the next morning.

The “Change Open %” in post # 599, was for stocks “after the Market Opens.” But are not intended for gapper stocks, since they have made their 1st moves during pre-market (PM). I do add them to the Change Open % watch list, to see how they behave after PM.

But I do give special interest to Gappers, which appear in my Gap Down or Gap Up scanner prior to market Open. In case your platform doesn’t have a scanner like mine, then use the one provided by:
· NASADQ Link: http://dynamic.nasdaq.com/dynamic/premarketma.stm
· There is another link called a heat map of the NDX – 100, and gives a false sense of gapers, which most are not. http://screening.nasdaq.com/heatmaps/heatmap_pmi.asp
· Another source is CNBC’s (from my TV Cable service, which has a ticker shown on the bottom of the screen (not sure if it’s the same or even available in EU). I don’t use this either, only my scanner.

I have had success trading gapper stocks. But, I do not trade Pre-Market (PM), its to risky, insufficient volume, and lack any history, with news. But I am only interested in stocks, which have “Blow Out Earnings.” Not stocks, which just met their earnings estimates, these are already priced in so I don’t pay attention to these. There is a lot of risk with trading these stocks, the earnings news is not all relevant, and many have devious strategies to line their pockets with our money. Therefore, I keep an eye on the price action of a strong EPS stock during PM, then put it on a PM chart and only trade the stock if it breaks out in the direction of the PM trend (I don’t like bottom fishing nor a pull back). In other words, I use triggers, which I set above or below their trading range during PM. Blow Out Earnings stocks “usually” go up, but not always, that’s where the triggers come in. If these stocks don’t have great momentum, and a narrow spread, then I stay away. I try to have these stocks show me that they have the momentum to push through my triggers, but they do pull back, & I haven’t been able to tell which stocks will. These stocks usually ignore the market trend, O/B or O/S conditions.

I stay away from “stocks being bought out”, and stocks with light trading volume like 12K, and cheap stocks below $20. Also, trading stocks with large PM price movements (Gappers) are very, very risky. I would recommend paper trading them, and take notes on their vol, gap % change, etc. during PM. Then set triggers outside of the PM range, and see what happens. The best stocks have a lot of momentum, and are reasonably well known stocks. Usually the high vol stocks that we don’t trade, like INTC, MSFT, CISCO, etc, are “not good candidates” (they’re fool's gold). Last thing, for gappers, stocks with >= 3 % Gap Open are proper candidates. GOOG for example, always gaps up/dwn on most PM’s but didn’t pass 3% gap req’mnt. But has had blow out earnings since its been in the market ( 4 times/yr).. On Friday’s market open, GOOG established a PM range between 460.0/Hi, and a 456.5/Lo. I set triggers over the PM range being 460.5 as trigger for a Long – which wasn’t hit, instead it hit my Short Trigger of 456.9, which I didn’t follow, since my rule is to go with the EPS trend from AH into PM as being a LONG. I don’t like trading stocks above $80, so I was willing to trade 100 shs due to the risk, it had an ATR(1) = 1.55 during martket open on Friday. I’ve had a tendency lately to not short gappers, therefore missed the SNDK short trigger from 51.9 for about a 200c move.
Just a note, Gap stock trading dangerous, & especially for those without a lot of experience.

Nas
 
Last edited:
Trader333 said:
Nas,

In my view this only really applies when either the market is quiet or there is low liquidity. If there is strong volume then it doesnt matter how deep the pockets of a MM are as they will get stung badly if they try and move a market because strong volume will counter act artificial moves. The opposite is true for markets with low volume or when trading is quiet at around lunchtimes. In many ways a strong market is great for trading especially if you are using appropriate oscillators at OB or OS levels with stocks near their high or low of the day.

AAPL was a great example of this on Friday when INDU went OS, AAPL was close to its high of the day and gave a nice 40c up move before giving an exhaustion signal. It actually went up another 9c but 40c is good enough for me.

Paul

Totally agree with you Paul, and AAPL was a good example.

But the comment I made pertained to trading these markets with a professional trading platform, without it chances of success are limited.

Nas
 
But the comment I made pertained to trading these markets with a professional trading platform, without it chances of success are limited.

Nas,

Yes I see your point now and agree :)


Paul
 
Trader333 said:
Nas,

In my view this only really applies when either the market is quiet or there is low liquidity. If there is strong volume then it doesnt matter how deep the pockets of a MM are as they will get stung badly if they try and move a market because strong volume will counter act artificial moves. The opposite is true for markets with low volume or when trading is quiet at around lunchtimes. In many ways a strong market is great for trading especially if you are using appropriate oscillators at OB or OS levels with stocks near their high or low of the day.

AAPL was a great example of this on Friday when INDU went OS, AAPL was close to its high of the day and gave a nice 40c up move before giving an exhaustion signal. It actually went up another 9c but 40c is good enough for me.


Paul

Hi Paul,

Quite often, I find that the market goes to OB (or OS) before the stock does that (only from EXITING point of view). For exiting from a profitable trade-at the moment I tend to close the position as soon as the market goes to OB (or OS as the case may be) but in many cases I find that the stock still continues the trend for some more (10-20C)time before the EE comes on. Should the exit signal for a profitable trade be considered from the market or the stock?

Cheers

Raj
 
evostik said:
Hi Naz

Thanks for your posts which I find helpful.

Could you tell me something: do you use a "Darvas" based technique in your trading?

Thanks Again

Steve
Appreciate your comment.

No I don't. I have read his 1st book and found it very interesting. I only use his technique as it relates to a price break out, but not in various blocks.

A very interesting book on successful traders is "Lessons from the Greatest Stock Traders of all time." by John Boik. Published in 2004, and has a short autobiography on Livermore, Baruch, Loeb, Darvas, and O’Neil’s style of trading. But these trading styles were for long term gains, not our type of scalp trading. But again it was very interesting on the risks these traders took and how each of them had many similarities, one of which was to buy higher and sell higher. Which was a Darvas type strategy, & mentined by Grey1 also in his last paltalk session.

Nas
 
Trader333 said:
Nas,

In my view this only really applies when either the market is quiet or there is low liquidity. If there is strong volume then it doesnt matter how deep the pockets of a MM are as they will get stung badly if they try and move a market because strong volume will counter act artificial moves. The opposite is true for markets with low volume or when trading is quiet at around lunchtimes. In many ways a strong market is great for trading especially if you are using appropriate oscillators at OB or OS levels with stocks near their high or low of the day.

AAPL was a great example of this on Friday when INDU went OS, AAPL was close to its high of the day and gave a nice 40c up move before giving an exhaustion signal. It actually went up another 9c but 40c is good enough for me.


Paul

Thanks for posting Paul, I normally go down to my local (starbucks) when its Nasdaq lunch time :) I think Grey1 has said prevously thats when the Big Boys let their software programs wiggle and jiggle.
 
O/S or O/B Conditions w/INDU & Stocks

I am new to Grey1’s strategy on the use of O/B or O/S oscillators (it does take awhile to become comfortable using it). I’ve used other oscillators several years ago, but found none of them to be of any value, until I found the MACCI. The MACCI-20, 6ma in 3 different TS’s is new to me, which I didn’t think was even possible. It has made a lot of sense (the 6ma smoothing has removed the unnecessary oscillations), and I have been trying to understand, and obtain experience in their use. Therefore, I’ve come up with a process using it in a non-TS platform.

I use a modified EE, which I also use as an alert, since using this method allows me to find which of my core stocks have hit their O/B-S values. So I just wanted to list some of my experiences and see if anyone can add to this process, and especially on the proper entry after the MACCI (O/S) hit bottom & makes its turn up for a long.

I don’t have a true alert system yet, don’t know if I ever will, but I’ve started to copy & paste my modified EE on the hour, and sometimes at the ½ hour into excel. So at 14:10 (ET-NY) today when I copied & pasted my EE from my platform into excel, I noticed that the market & several stocks were O/S in all 3 TF’s. It’s been difficult for me to find these O/B or O/S conditions, so I’ve found this method successful in finding these conditions. It makes me check this list in a static mode, and need the discipline and patience from over trading.

I’ve attached the O/S 1, 3, & 5 min Charts (in MS Word) for both INDU and AAPL (6 charts). I’ve annotated all of the charts with a vertical “Light Blue” Line the time of 14:10 (ET), same as listed on the modified EE. Then drew another vertical “Red” Line at 14:33 (ET) to show the best probable time to enter this trade (that is when the MACCI turns up with the INDU leading). I need to learn how to walk with this, before I can run with it.

I’ve also attached )in MS Excel) my modified EE, which utilizes the 1, 5, & 10 Min TF’s, since my platform doesn’t have a 3 Min formula. On this EE, I also have the 3 different min. ATR’s for position sizing, and awareness of risk in minutes, same as the EE. Good thing that the shorter TF’s in the charts are better for trading, after verification with the 3 & 5 min.

It’s taken me awhile to set up my system into a more mechanical method, which I have not had in the past. It is still a work in progress, and becoming better each week. Again, thanks to Grey1’s discussions in this thread, "make your trading as mechanical as possible."

The real issue I have “when are the TF’s showing O/S conditions ripe” for a stock entry? My take on this is after the 3 & 5 TF’s both become O/S (as in this case), and start their turn up (from bottom) with the 1 min, as long as the 3 & 5 TF’s also have come out of their bottoms (naturally the 3 & 5 take longer). Note, that in the INDU 1 Min chart, the MACCI started up and then bottom again and finally took off. It’s been rare, for me, to find the INDU & a stock that match all of this. Naturally, after the market opened, the INDU went into a trending mode, being O/B from 9:45 ish till 13:00 ish (ET), best seen in the 5 min chart.

Can someone with more experience with this strategy make some comments about this?

Hopefully, we can clear things up.

Nas
 

Attachments

  • OS in all 3 TF's INDU + AAPL, 10-23-06.doc
    110.5 KB · Views: 32
  • OS in all 3 TF's, INDU + AAPL, 10-23-06.xls
    16.5 KB · Views: 14
Nas,

You may find it helpful to simplify things a little.

When the Dow MACCIs go OB or OS just look for the strongest / weakest stock in your list and consider going long / short. No need to worry about the stock's MACCIs but, if you do, additonal confirmation is always valuable.
 
LevII said:
Nas,

You may find it helpful to simplify things a little.

When the Dow MACCIs go OB or OS just look for the strongest / weakest stock in your list and consider going long / short. No need to worry about the stock's MACCIs but, if you do, additonal confirmation is always valuable.

I agree. It's always been my understanding from Grey1s explanations that when Dow goes OS it's more important to choose the strongest stock to go long not necessarily one that is also OS (vice versa for shorts obviously). I found that focusing on finding an OS stock tends to risk choosing a stock which has weakened recently when you want to find a stock which has not pulled back much as the market has fallen.

Regards,

Gareth
 
Trader333 said:
Closed at $73.80 for +24


Paul, as always many thanks for posting and giving the rest of us a chance to learn from your trades, I am sure its appreciated by many :)

Good entry, but I am not too sure about the exit, as the 1 min "maki" for the <a href="http://www.trade2win.com/?=stock">stock</a> became exhausted well before your exit?
 
Grey1 SKYP TRADING REPORT

As you all know i am currently trading live on SKPY with 4 other members of this BB .. It has been 14 trading days and i only lost one day which i posted a $2000 loss and got it back next day.
ALL IN ALL 13 WIN DAYS with the best win yesterday of $3165 ( I was up $3600 ish at one stage but gave some back )

I am using strategy 3 and also the vwap engine .

THIS IS MY INTRA DAY TRADIN PERFORMANCE ..

GREY1
 
garethb said:
I agree. It's always been my understanding from Grey1s explanations that when Dow goes OS it's more important to choose the strongest stock to go long not necessarily one that is also OS (vice versa for shorts obviously). I found that focusing on finding an OS stock tends to risk choosing a stock which has weakened recently when you want to find a stock which has not pulled back much as the market has fallen.

Regards,

Gareth


I agree .. YOU CHOOSE THE STRONGEST STOCK ( STOCKS THAT ARE NEAR THEIR HIGH OF THE DAY WHEN THE EE SHOWED OS ) .. If you have the support of their MACCI as well then you increase ur pos size

Grey1
 
LevII said:
Nas,

You may find it helpful to simplify things a little.

When the Dow MACCIs go OB or OS just look for the strongest / weakest stock in your list and consider going long / short. No need to worry about the stock's MACCIs but, if you do, additonal confirmation is always valuable.
100 % agree
 
samtron said:
Thanks for posting Paul, I normally go down to my local (starbucks) when its Nasdaq lunch time :) I think Grey1 has said prevously thats when the Big Boys let their software programs wiggle and jiggle.
SPOT ON CONSOLIDATION DOES NOT PAY


TRADE THE CHOAS and NOT WHEN PROGRAM TRADERS ARE AT THEIR BEST

GREY1
 
Top