illbegentle
Newbie
- Messages
- 3
- Likes
- 0
hi quick noob question, how do you set the be+5@25 and LCtrue?
thank you!
thank you!
hi quick noob question, how do you set the be+5@25 and LCtrue?
thank you!
Results of the last 25 trades to also show the results for latest FMT settings
For me these are sessions between 21 March and 6 May inclusive.
35/45/be+5@25 I'm going to call this FMT3 +285 pips
35/40/be@20 I'm calling this FMT2, + 120 pips
40/40 no BE I'm calling this FMT1 + 200 pips
There seems a definite benefit recently in the new recommendations
These are for starting at 06.30 until mid April, then 06.15 when Mark said change.
Other sets:
Deserteagle +214. This set has suffered quite a few break even closings, and I know it has since been revised by our friend, but I find it interesting on account of the 65SL just to watch how it does
10/40 +150 Although the net pips don't look so good, drawdown is minimal and this is a good set for compounding at risks of 2 right up to 20 per cent per trade (for the speculative traders)
28/40 + 292 This set has done very well lately after a faltering start to the year.
Cheers for the feedback Mike, did they give any indication as to why they were reluctant to offer spreadbetting ?
another newbie question - I have set up the EA to trade with the spreadbetting firm - but the trade only takes 0.5 pip trades - I have trademanagement set to true and 2% (it's a 10k demo account) so would expect it to be more like 5-6 pips per trade - I assume the default settings are for trading lots or minilots, which I have no experience of,so wondering what I need to change - thanks
another newbie question - I have set up the EA to trade with the spreadbetting firm - but the trade only takes 0.5 pip trades - I have trademanagement set to true and 2% (it's a 10k demo account) so would expect it to be more like 5-6 pips per trade - I assume the default settings are for trading lots or minilots, which I have no experience of,so wondering what I need to change - thanks
I look forward to your statistics.
I am really just an EA user who is becoming interested in learning to trade. So far I am learning most about patience and greed. This seems like watching grass grow when patently it is quite the opposite!
I find this forum almost addictive, with opinion, advice and humour flying in all directions.
It's my Achille's heel because it sticks me with a dose of emotion about my trades and settings: Should I alter them? ... I'm sure others are familiar with this feeling.
I look forward to your statistics.
I am really just an EA user who is becoming interested in learning to trade. So far I am learning most about patience and greed. This seems like watching grass grow when patently it is quite the opposite!
It takes 10 minutes to do the stats on 'what could be' and seems to take forever to experience 'what will be'!
My number one criterion was to earn some 'extra' by having to do 'nothing'. I have tried hard to organise my accounts, use VPSs and try and leave alone. Although I never meddle, I find this forum almost addictive, with opinion, advice and humour flying in all directions.
It's my Achille's heel because it sticks me with a dose of emotion about my trades and settings: Should I alter them? Why not open another account and trade those settings? Why not just put that money into the 'old faithful'? His or her 'old faithful' seems better than mine .... I'm sure others are familiar with this feeling.
I sometimes think I must abstain from the forum and just let things happen and try and let FMT just work for me in the background as I'd intended.
I'm sure many here feel similar things. I just thought I'd share something a little different..... until the next post... and the next... and the next...!
I couldn't agree more....
I return to the thought that the best thing to do is decide on a decent setting and stick with it. I think if I were to analyse each month's best set and use it for the next month the end result would be worse than any other!
Here are a few facts to support the 'leave it alone' theory:
191 trades for the last exactly 12 months:
FMT1 40/40 +1880
by putting in BE @ 20 you'd have 1800
FMT2 35/40 with BE @ 20 +1685
if you ignored break even resets, +1665 (Hey where's the big difference?)
10/40 +1260, with 93% winning trades
28/40 +1812
20/40 +1180 (quite a useless setting really!)
so at the end of 12 months is there really a meaningful difference between a set that gets you 1665 and one that gets you 1880? I say not. It's only the difference between 2 or 3 trades going to TP instead of SL
I couldn't agree more....
I return to the thought that the best thing to do is decide on a decent setting and stick with it. I think if I were to analyse each month's best set and use it for the next month the end result would be worse than any other!
Here are a few facts to support the 'leave it alone' theory:
191 trades for the last exactly 12 months:
FMT1 40/40 +1880
by putting in BE @ 20 you'd have 1800
FMT2 35/40 with BE @ 20 +1685
if you ignored break even resets, +1665 (Hey where's the big difference?)
10/40 +1260, with 93% winning trades
28/40 +1812
20/40 +1180 (quite a useless setting really!)
so at the end of 12 months is there really a meaningful difference between a set that gets you 1665 and one that gets you 1880? I say not. It's only the difference between 2 or 3 trades going to TP instead of SL
Maybe a more interesting exercise would be to try and find a set that doesn't work! Mike
TP=50, Sl=10, No B/E
Trading Times Allowed: December,April & August, UK and US bank Holidays!!! 😆
Just ran a backtest on that set on those dates. - +115 pips HeHe
10/40 +1260, with 93% winning trades
Hey, what actually is this? I have been watching FMT recently and noticed it went down hill quite badly, although still doing ok.. the setting above seems crazy, 93% with an indicator is a great achievement, what does 10/40 actually mean? Cheers
30 precious pips again today