Ah well, 40/40 bit the dust, spectacularly in the last few minutes. Missed TP by between 1 and 2 and hit SL. This shows just how sensitive to minor changes all these statistics are in forward testing.
Results of the last 10 trades in treacherous conditions:
(It's a case of which set lost the least, then arguably which set is capable of fastest recovery and can it possibly be one with just 10tp?).
10/40 -100
35/45/BE+5@25 -110
43/65/BE@20 -174
28/40 no BE -196
35/40/BE@20 -205
40/40 no BE -240
============
Results of the last 12 months on a rolling basis
40/40 +1680
28/40 +1668
43/65/BE@20 (Deserteagle v1) +1598
35/40/BE@20 +1520
10/40 +1180
Better luck is on the way, have a great weekend
Funnily enough I have noticed that the sets which performed best over 12 months are almost a mirror image of the results of the last 10 trades. Possibly the message from this is that the more aggressive TP/SL settings have suffered the most in the difficult conditions recently experienced, but have done best in the long run taking the rough with the smooth. For those of us who invest in equities and other such volatile investments there is nothing unusual about this observation