Ok, you're conservative with your risk per trade but adventurous with your settings (if you accept the 65 pip occasional loss). I am currently going back through my trades and potential trades prior to December at which time my settings were giving 80pc success rate, to see which of my losing trades your wider SL settings would have actually saved me
FMT has made a total of 202 pips since August last year to this very present day 30 Jan 2011.
That is only equal to 33 pips per month. The very dynamics of this EA (manual system) has changed considerably in the past few months.
All the back testing in the world is not going to make anything better in “real time” a 40 pip stop or a 65 pip is not going to change the fact that we have to understand in “real time” the markets mood.
In December people said “oh it’s the holiday’s” we are now at the end of January and nothing has changed. Some will say “it this or that”, but the simple fact is not many know the reason for the wins that took place or the losses.
Where the wins results of news either from the Asian session or the prior day’s news release that lingered on into the next day or weeks? and was the FMT trade in the same direction of the news out come ? Which resulted in wins, or were the losses counter trend trades like the one we had last week after the UK GDP number 25 January. That drove the GBP/USD down and the next day’s Long trade on the 26 January( counter trend trade lost)
Which after hitting the FMT stop turned right around and went Long in the same direction as the original signal, do you really think it saved some because of the wider stop? Do you really?
Or does your mind tell you it was because
additional members of the MPC saw the need for a rate hike, beside Andrew Sentence? And the GBP/USD just rallied up. Will you look back and say it was because of a bigger stop loss that was used when you do the back test?
I say NO, the move happen and took place after the news release and it favored the UK which caused the move, any one who thinks it was because of the bigger stop used is foolish.
What is to say what we saw in December and again in January will not continue forward? Sure again “after the fact” back testing will show you (us) “oh a stop loss of this would have worked”. But in real time what really happen to cause that move or make it continue is all that counts?
My comments are not in ANY form an insult to ANYONE AT ALL!!