I agree Optioholic, the stock market is a less risky proposition over the long term meaning more people can benefit. It has been said that as many as 1% of people make sports betting pay. However, I have to disagree with what you say with regards mathematical based edges as I think this is most suited to sports...for example, sports aren't affected by as many variables (ie., earthquake in Japan). I also feel it is so much more difficult to price up a company correctly and then for the market to catchup and price it up correctly later i.e., profit (with sports the end of the event proves you right or wrong regardless of whether the market ever eventually gets it right).
Monotonetuba, I have heard so many horror stories about those using martingale plans that I offered my concerns. The martingales are a favourite of sports tipsters for a dark reason - the longer the subscriber is winning the longer they subscribe. The martingale will allow very long periods of winnings until one large bad crunch where it is all lost. You should look at the math if you haven't already. Maybe I'll follow this up when I get chance to show how easy it would be to bankrupt a bank from 5p stakes!
Monotonetuba, I have heard so many horror stories about those using martingale plans that I offered my concerns. The martingales are a favourite of sports tipsters for a dark reason - the longer the subscriber is winning the longer they subscribe. The martingale will allow very long periods of winnings until one large bad crunch where it is all lost. You should look at the math if you haven't already. Maybe I'll follow this up when I get chance to show how easy it would be to bankrupt a bank from 5p stakes!