Mug
How wrong you are about me. This is part of the first post I made on this thread, and you will see that I am defending you!
29/12/03
"MUG2K, while he was boorish two weeks ago, has gone away, regrouped and returned with a good attitude. He is doing nothing more than putting up his trades in advance and he will live or die by the results – but let’s wait for the results first.
He is not tricking anyone. As for being a 23 year old, So what? If his system turns out to be rubbish then at least he tried. He's made a few errors recently, but he's not suggesting anyone spend any money either with him or trading his calls.
HOW WRONG I WAS.
Your whole attitude, conduct and refusal to answer questions very quickly made me realise I had misread you.
I strongly believe in defending any position I believe in but also will strongly disagree with the indefensible. No half measures.
I did tell you that if your conduct didn't change you could expect problems.
You know how to stop the negative posts on this thread, but despite many members telling you , you still haven't taken the hint, have you?
I believe you are just hoping to front it out by not answering questions you find uncomfortable (like most of mine, for example).
It won't work. The members on this forum are too savvy to let you get away with anything.
As someone who followed and profited from Hugo's (IK) trades and have followed the Dow 96 thread with interest, it would be quite wrong for you to think I don't want your system to succeed. Infact, I stated this only recently. But I believe in carrying out Due Diligence and anyone not prepared to answer my reasonable questions can expect what follows and shouldn't moan later.
Either all the members who have asked you for answers are wrong to do so, or you are for not answering.
No prizes for the answer to that one.
Now, as you go to type out some sarcy reply to this post, why not say to yourself ' No, instead of being sarcy I'll just answer all the questions people have asked me'
FAT CHANCE OF THAT, EH?