More importantly, you have yet to demonstrate how Bitcoin actually generates wealth through a typical economic chain that result in a service or product. Currently Bitcoin's intrinsic economic valuation is sustained through "greater fools" rather than any attributable economic value as a service or product.
In essence, what economic service or product that you get for paying $16,000 for a single Bitcoin? It is simply speculative valuation rather than economic wealth creation.
Is it not the case that everything we have is based on faith?
Faith that Gold has meaning / faith that FIAT currency has meaning / faith that Crypto currency has meaning?
We then change the word “meaning” into value and hows its underpinned. We value gold/silver/oil etc as its underpinned by FIAT currency (currently) or we can argue it works visa versa. We value Bitcoin as it is also underpinned by FIAT currency (how else do we get $16k a coin)
If I own a market stall and someone wants to buy a kilo of apples using a bar of gold, I have a decision to accept the transaction or not, and that decision is based on the fact I can cash out the gold, either now or at a later date. They could give me a piece of Picasso art (again underpinned by a currency valuation).
So for now, the likes of Bitcoin only have value if it is being underpinned by FIAT currency, as this is all we have known.
BUT it could all change, adapt or die, but that is the future and it will play out the way it is meant to.
I have yet to meet anyone whom is purchasing Bitcoin for any other reason other than to
increase their FIAT currency wealth.
That’s not to say there are no entities whom see crypto as other means (like I say, its just that I personally dont know anyone),
but bottom line is we would not be having this discussion if the FIAT currency value of bitcoin was not increasing at such a rapid rate.
Still all about di Dollaz!!