ChartMan said:
Debs, you did well, but I see your entry as a gamble , which sometimes pays off, sometimes it doesn't..
Hi CM...I need help. I often feel that my trades are ‘gambles’, so I think I will be ‘paper-trading’ for a long time to come.
Could you give me a few pointers as to why you thought my entry point yesterday was a gamble. I based the entry on 3 things:
1. after the rise back to the ema and failure to cross it, the Dow clearly fell back down.
2. I had a resistance line marked in at 10480 (from previous days).
3. the upper DOW had hit (and turned down from) the upper AIQ band. (I know you are familiar with AIQ, and the upper band often signifies an overbought position).
(At the end of this, I will try to attach a chart....if I succeed, the red line is the 100 ema and the blue lines are the AIQ bands).
Was it a ‘gamble’ because it was too early in the session to identify a trend? Or was the move back up to the ema too large to be considered a ‘pullback’?
I see on TTs post that there was some news out about this time. This was a complete oversight on my part – I hadn’t checked for any economic announcements – is this another reason why the entry was a gamble?
However, if I hadn’t entered at 9:49, I would have gone short at 10:06, or failing that, at 10:27. At both these times, the DOW moved up to and fell back from the ema.
Also, I can see why it would be good to go long at 432, but I have been working on the basis that if the price is under the 100ema, I should be short. I have only been entering a trade if the DOW crosses the ema and is confirmed by a PB. As a beginner, I thought I should be ‘trading with the trend’, rather than doing counter-trend trades. Therefore my earlier entry seemed more correct.
I'm sorry if these are really stupid questions........Debs