More trades with less profits or less trades with more profits?
On longer timeframes, signals are usually cleaner and surer but I am used to thinking that the less you stay in the market, the better since there is less chance to lose.
From many years of experience I can say that scalping doesn't work at the retail level especially, sorry to crush anyone's dreams, I'm just being realistic. Of course, you can suceed at scalping in the same way that someone can have a fantastic streak on blackjack or roulette, but eventially it will catch up with you. There are so many reasons why scalping won't work, but I'm afraid I don't have time to go through it in detail now. Good luck though if you want to give it a try, sometimes its best to experience things first hand rather than listen to other people's comments.
zoo;1255562 said:From many years of experience I can say that scalping doesn't work at the retail level especially, sorry to crush anyone's dreams, I'm just being realistic. Of course, you can suceed at scalping in the same way that someone can have a fantastic streak on blackjack or roulette, but eventially it will catch up with you. There are so many reasons why scalping won't work, but I'm afraid I don't have time to go through it in detail now. Good luck though if you want to give it a try, sometimes its best to experience things first hand rather than listen to other people's comments.
More trades with less profits or less trades with more profits?
On longer timeframes, signals are usually cleaner and surer but I am used to thinking that the less you stay in the market, the better since there is less chance to lose.
From many years of experience I can say that scalping doesn't work at the retail level especially, sorry to crush anyone's dreams, I'm just being realistic. Of course, you can suceed at scalping in the same way that someone can have a fantastic streak on blackjack or roulette, but eventially it will catch up with you. There are so many reasons why scalping won't work, but I'm afraid I don't have time to go through it in detail now. Good luck though if you want to give it a try, sometimes its best to experience things first hand rather than listen to other people's comments.
Totally disagree.
It may not work for you. But it does work for some people. Retail traders included.
I see you are no longer taking offence to my comment.
To clarify what you have written. It is not a question of what I like or dislike.
Indicators and charts are not fractal in nature! You can not even say that about an indicator. An indicator is what it is, "an indicator". Put in your thinking, an indicator merely describes a chart at certain discrete points, perhaps "continuouss" in time.
It is the chart that you should really be interested in. A chart can be deterministic or nondeterministic but not fractal. I will not bother with the definition of a fractal here. Charts are actually nondeterministic and run according to an underlying motion/motive which is random in its nature. It is then the task of the trader to make some sense of chart data through indicators, albeit on short term intervals. A fractal on the other hand is something completely different.
Some would disagree, of course, different school of thought -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_analysis
and Wayne McDonell, quote - "Fortunately, for Forex traders, one part of Chaos Theory is Fractal Geometry. Basically this means that the patterns you see on a 15-minute chart generally hold true on the hourly, daily and weekly charts—effectively all charts in all time frames. In other words, the strategy you would apply to a head & shoulders pattern on a 15-minute chart is—roughly speaking—equally applicable on a head & shoulders pattern on a daily chart."
Good point, but as snowman´s said different points of view.
Well, if you read my starting post carefully, you shall discover that I never wanted to start a debate which one is good or bad, I'm merely trying to ask about the difference of the two styles, given their different average true range, duration, volatility and leverage involved.
Perhaps it was my fault that I did not write it carefully in my first post, so it led to some misunderstanding. Please allow me to clarify.
I think I should have renamed the title as, "Can scalping make you rich AS MUCH AS POSITION TRADING". As I stated, there are people making money in the intraday way of trading, like Mr Chart in this forum (see first post). What I want to know is, given the inherent advantage for larger target profit in swing/position trading, can intraday traders compensate for this with larger leverage? If so, do they risk more due to high involatility in short time frames?
So put it in another way, the question of whether scalping give an annual return on the par of (or even better than) swing or position trading is what really interested me. I shall reiterate than I know some people can only do one of them, so for them this question is meaningless. But suppose you can do both and your personality does not have any bias towards either, which would you prefer in terms of profitability, if you are only allowed to choose one?
Well my friend....., 40k is not bad at all in eigth months.....
Any way regarding GCC´s question, i preffer position trading, risk/reward ratio is higher when you know how to do it.
I just saw someone naming a site where they made 22.5 ticks a day this year scalping the ES what is a very good performance if you have traded with just 1 contract. In the mean time his post is removed, but maybe is the guy still around and can he tell me with how many contracts that website made those trades? Because I think they used more contracts, something they didn't wrote on their site. And that will set their results in a whole other view!