. The whole globe village is moving to one of unity and the BNP want to take us back to the dark ages.
Yes, but poco poco. Ok? I would like something better than BNP, to be sure, so New Labour and Tories had better get more efficient policies.
. The whole globe village is moving to one of unity and the BNP want to take us back to the dark ages.
Both, now you mention it. Cotton, another viable model which involved slavery.
The problem with groups such as the BNP, is that they have a mean spirited agenda. Their existence stifles what would otherwise be justifiable topics of debate.
I.e. importance of integration and adoption of host country's norms and customs
Triangle involved sending ships to Africa, capturing slaves, trading these for cotton from the Southern plantation owners, bringing the cotton to mills in Lancashire for garment production. And so the process went on and on.
Learnt that when I was 11 or something like that ... maybe a little hazy
Slaves used to be a commodity market, one lot used to be a ship full, until micro lots were introduced which were a family of four...honestly.
call me a pussy, but I hate categorising people into lot sizes
Yes... but BNP is not only about immigration. Its clearly a racist party and its agenda is clearly on its website. You don't need a racist party to debate about immigration. The mainstream parties are already debating it - without having racist undertones.
Do you see the difference?
I don't think anything has originated from Japan
At another level Japanese car plants have opened in the Midlands and the Japanese management have found British workers equally good and hard working by induction training them into the Japanese way of working. The ex-Leyland workers have embraced this new management style and taken to it like ducks to water.
British class infested management system with their daft fat cat payments and elitist policies haven't managed the workers or engaged the unions.
are you suggesting if we take the Japanese model to its nth degree we can emulate the manufacturing poweress thus rectifying our problems?
You're not a pussy. We catagorise each other everyday, without even realising it, that's nature. Maybe not in lots though.
I'm reminded of a derogatory term here used about smaller traders which seems somewhat apt:
"One lot willy"
Overall I agree but they did invent the Walkman which was, at the time, totally unique.
Err from what I recall carrying a ghetto blaster on your shoulders were the first walkman invented by body popping rappers on the streets of NY. The Japanese merely improved on the idea.
So on the one hand they are workaholics and not to be admired but then when we copy them we seem happy to do so and embrace it.
They did not embrace the 16 hours. Merely their robotic punctual good standards. Not your Carry-On style slap dash approach of working to rule and closed shops and the rest... Perhaps we can give some credit for Mrs T. for scrapping those rules.
I partly agree in that British management have been and still are some of the worst you could ever have the misfortune to have in positions that they are in.
In my view British manufacturing did not collapse for just one reason. If you look at France and Germany they have almost all of theirs intact. In the case of France it was because they manipulated things so that imports were severely limited whilst giving their manufacturers time to come up the the world class standards of (dare I say it), Japanese manufactured exports.
Yes as before agree here. Be interested to find out more about the partly. I do admire likes of John Harvey-Jones and Alan Sugar
Yes in manufacturing and no for other areas of life. I have personally seen companies transformed beyond recognition from a failing loss making organisation to leaders in their sector or niche by implementing continuous improvement philosophies tools and techniques which are based on the Japanese model. That said these approaches were actually developed by Americans but were initially rejected by US corporations. The Japanese were the first to take them on board and effectively forced others who found they were being crushed by them to start implementing the same.
Paul
Shred the Fred more likely to sue the Government and win... :-0
He should, i think he would win. WTF was this crazy Labour government up to asking him to give some of his pension back? Was this the same government that give Gerry Adams parliamentry office space? Wasn't this government partly to blame for the UK banking crisis? Besides, i think it was all staged anyway, just so that Joe Muggins electorate felt that sombody was on his side.
How is it that likes of TNT, UPS and DHL can make money and Royal Mail can't?
I'm reminded of a derogatory term here used about smaller traders which seems somewhat apt:
"One lot willy"
not all lots are equal. some are more equal than others ... a phrase coined by snowball I believe (animal farm) As a STIR trader you tend to trade larger volume .... but I digress.
Perhaps I should keep out of discussions until I can afford an institutional sized schlong. Then I can scare other traders into submission
Atilla, you have some seriously worrying views and to me they come across as extremist in much the same way that you argue that the BNP is extreme.