Belflan's US stock swing trades

weak market tonight down 1.8%;

The birth off a trend north?? (or at least a few days of a technicial bounce?)_ MACCI day O/S

INDU 11th Jan 2008 day & 10min.JPG

strong list

strong list 11th jan 2008.JPG

weak list

weak list 11th jan 2008.JPG
 
Last edited:
not sure steve, i've been having a few probs with back fill data, its probibly me

glen

Macci 11th Jan 2007 indu daily.JPG
 
Hi
My daily MACCI reading of indu at close was -78. I guess tha one of us is getting an incorrect reading!

Maybe someone else could share their reading?

Steve

Hi Steve-mine shows -80.785. If I remember correctly, G1 had said ( & I feel the same)that it is not absolutely necesssary for the turn to take place at any specific value..so lets see what happens on Monday....

Raj
 
Hi Steve-mine shows -80.785. If I remember correctly, G1 had said ( & I feel the same)that it is not absolutely necesssary for the turn to take place at any specific value..so lets see what happens on Monday....

Raj

Steve/Raj,
For the record I am enclosing a copy of my TS8 chart. Mine says -77.64!
Cheers,
Imran
 

Attachments

  • indu-11-01-2008.jpg
    indu-11-01-2008.jpg
    63.4 KB · Views: 23
Last edited:
Steve/Raj,
For the record I am enclosing a copy of my TS8 chart. Mine says -77.64!
Cheers,
Imran

Hi Imran,

I see that you have TS8 many others here have ts2000i that run ELS codes.. I am having a problem with the some codes posted here. Grey1 and paul have given me some codes that work but ohters I get errors and no displays.

I have to figure out how to use the global variiable 2.2 if you have the code for macci in charting and in radarscreen would you be so kind to share it with me. i can run ELD codes in TS 8.3. still having problems learn everything.

thanks
 
Steve/Raj,
For the record I am enclosing a copy of my TS8 chart. Mine says -77.64!
Cheers,
Imran

thanks for posting the chart Imran, it made me realise i have a bar or two missing from Thurs & Friday on my chart

cheers
Glen
 
Could some kind soul help me out in pinning down the MACCI? I don't use Tradestation but my guess from looking at the indicator legend in Imran's post that it's referring to a 5 period adaptive/exponential ma of the 6 period CCI. From my trawls through the TT threads I believed that sometime ago the question was asked as to the "correct" parameter values to use - 20,6 or 6,5 and I thought the answer came back 20,6 but I may have been mistaken and would have to start the search again in order to confirm. When communicating with Iraj I also thought that 20,6 got his blessing. Now confusion returns to my already fuddled brain. Either way, my calculated values differ significantly from the two values posted previously - but I can tackle that problem later!
Any views would be much appreciated.

Al
 
Could some kind soul help me out in pinning down the MACCI? I don't use Tradestation but my guess from looking at the indicator legend in Imran's post that it's referring to a 5 period adaptive/exponential ma of the 6 period CCI. From my trawls through the TT threads I believed that sometime ago the question was asked as to the "correct" parameter values to use - 20,6 or 6,5 and I thought the answer came back 20,6 but I may have been mistaken and would have to start the search again in order to confirm. When communicating with Iraj I also thought that 20,6 got his blessing. Now confusion returns to my already fuddled brain. Either way, my calculated values differ significantly from the two values posted previously - but I can tackle that problem later!
Any views would be much appreciated.

Al

what charting software are you using?? If you have qoutetracker i can help you out its very easy.
 
moreagr, I'm sorry I havent started using the radarscreen with Iraj's stuff and I dont use the global variable dll so cant help you on that. However I had a quick search and came up with the following topics on the TS site:
https://www.tradestation.com/Discussions/Topic.aspx?Topic_ID=4235
https://www.tradestation.com/discussions/Topic.aspx?TOPIC_ID=16825
(the second link is specific to V2)
Regards,
Imran

hi Imran,

thanks anyway I will have to check the forums a little better
 
Paul,
Thanks for the clarification - nice to be sure I'm in tune with everybody else.

Moreagr,
I use Neoticker but nevertheless the offer is appreciated - thanks. It should be fairly simple to sort out but I need to look again as to why I'm getting a different result even with the 6,5 setting.
Probably best if I move to a new thread if I have to pursue this as I don't want to deflect from the main thrust of this thread.

Al
 
Paul,
Thanks for the clarification - nice to be sure I'm in tune with everybody else.

Moreagr,
I use Neoticker but nevertheless the offer is appreciated - thanks. It should be fairly simple to sort out but I need to look again as to why I'm getting a different result even with the 6,5 setting.
Probably best if I move to a new thread if I have to pursue this as I don't want to deflect from the main thrust of this thread.

Al

Al, The MACCI may produce a slightly different result from whatever you depending on what type of MA has been used in the MACCI to do the smoothing on the CCI. Try different MA's on your Neoticker.
Regards,
Imran
 
Al, The MACCI may produce a slightly different result from whatever you depending on what type of MA has been used in the MACCI to do the smoothing on the CCI. Try different MA's on your Neoticker.
Regards,
Imran

Yes, Imran, I know there are quite a number of different versions of the ema and also that the stabilisation of the ema depends on the number of data points that are included in the series. I feel that my values are too far away from the examples posted earlier for either of these possibilities to be the cause but I'll have to look into it tomorrow to be certain.

Thanks for the suggestion.

Al
 
Yes, Imran, I know there are quite a number of different versions of the ema and also that the stabilisation of the ema depends on the number of data points that are included in the series. I feel that my values are too far away from the examples posted earlier for either of these possibilities to be the cause but I'll have to look into it tomorrow to be certain.

Thanks for the suggestion.

Al

Al, I used the CCI (found in Tradestation) of length 6, smoothed it with a simple moving average of length 5 and I get the same value as MACCI as you can see from the enclosed picture.
Regards,
Imran
 

Attachments

  • CCIExample.jpg
    CCIExample.jpg
    81.5 KB · Views: 28
ok, havn't have an answer from G1 on the other thread yet about going long, in this, as he see it, a bear market,

so i'll plod on,

the daily chart INDU look like its cycleing north, has been O/S

INDU.JPG

attached is charts of stocks from the strong list that O/S ish on the MACCI day charts (on a simlar cycle to the INDU)

strong 1.JPG
strong 2.JPG
strong 3.JPG
strong 4.JPG
strong 5.JPG


will be looking for strength in these stocks tomorrow, then open longs at around close, and leave open till Wed if target not hit
 
ok, havn't have an answer from G1 on the other thread yet about going long, in this, as he see it, a bear market,

so i'll plod on,

the daily chart INDU look like its cycleing north, has been O/S

View attachment 32498

attached is charts of stocks from the strong list that O/S ish on the MACCI day charts (on a simlar cycle to the INDU)

View attachment 32492
View attachment 32493
View attachment 32494
View attachment 32495
View attachment 32496


will be looking for strength in these stocks tomorrow, then open longs at around close, and leave open till Wed if target not hit
Sorry just saw this post.. MACCI daily WAS heading up on THURSDAY but now is flattening which basically means bears are still in control. It is very bearish if MACCI flattens and heads down from OS levels. IN another word even TECHNICAL catalysts are not stong enough to take the market up.. I am bear LONG term and feel traders MUST BE SHORT of stocks in their swing portfolio SELL IN TO ANY RALLIES ....

Grey1
 
Top