Asian Coronavirus Outbreak

18 FLU virus existed without the world shutting down.
...........
Try and get your head around how research works. You don't go to the liars to 'confirm' that they were not lying. That's how the mainstream media and your 'fact checkers' operate.
.........
I don't know what your mental malfunction is, but off you fuck*, back to my ignore list.
Whilst I respect your right to have and express an opinion, I do get a very real sense of the "pot calling the kettle black". The 18 "flu" viruses were identified, researched and documented massively as quite definitely NOT flu long before the current entertainment. Yes they are similar but still NOT flu. Unless you are able to locate earlier research and other evidence that these historic viruses have all been wrongly identified, researched and documented for the last circa 60 years (and therefore part of some ongoing global hoax/conspiracy going back to the interwar period) then your assertion that they and Covid 19 are in fact the influenza virus appears either misguided or disingenuous.

The flu virus has been identified, researched and documented for 90 odd years being isolated in ferrets in the 1930s with the genome (influenza A virus subtype H1N1 or A/H1N1) being sequenced in 2005 and available here under accession numbers DQ208309.1 ,DQ208310.1 , DQ208311.1 :

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=influenza+1918+H1N1+2005

The details of the coronavirus genome (SARS-CoV-2) sequenced last year:


Other fun facts (if you still insist that CV19 is just "the flu") is that different strains of influenza have different rates of transmission and mortality. The MOAFs (1918 H1N1) had transmission rates of a minimum R1.5 and mortality rates anywhere between 2 and 10 percent - and that was frequently of the total population. Even more amusingly, the favourite age bracket was 20 - 25 and there were 4 waves that lasted beyond 1920 with a mere 2.5 million in Europe dying during the first one. Mass graves were not uncommon in other regions and quarantine measures were often enforced by the army and live ammunition - there was even a case in the USA where an enthusiastic health worker shot 3 people for not wearing masks.

A 2005 book published in the US is called "The Threat of Pandemic Influenza: Are We Ready?" and the conclusion was "ish"

Personally, I'm quite pleased it isn't the flu as that virus is far more prone to mutation than than wimpy old CV19 and so its chances of turning into something similar are much reduced.

* nice turn of phrase - I'll definitely be using that soon. Probably in Tesco's. :)
 
Bitchute again.
Yes, absolutely true that it's been around for yonks.
Yes it's also absolutely true that the "repurposing" of known medicines has been looking at this one for some years already and that it may well have beneficial effects for the virus amongst a host of other conditions.
What is definitely not true is that it's "safe" in the sense of say Vitamin C.
It has always been regarded as being possibly risky for people with eyesight problems and for oldsters...i.e anyone over the age of 65 and there are some nasty side-effects if taken in too higher doses or for too long. I was on it myself for a while back and my GP refused to renew my prescription at one point despite it appearing to have been of help - arthritis in my case.
 
So when a doctor prescribes a drug designed to treat cardiovascular problems as an erectile dysfunction treatment with the patients consent that OK (Viagra). But when a doctor prescribes a Malaria treatment to treat covid with the patients consent that can get him struck off (hydroxchloroquine).

The reasons for this are really really simple and it applies to everything ... who stands to make money from these (ir)regulations!
 
Bitchute again.
Yes, absolutely true that it's been around for yonks.
Yes it's also absolutely true that the "repurposing" of known medicines has been looking at this one for some years already and that it may well have beneficial effects for the virus amongst a host of other conditions.
What is definitely not true is that it's "safe" in the sense of say Vitamin C.
It has always been regarded as being possibly risky for people with eyesight problems and for oldsters...i.e anyone over the age of 65 and there are some nasty side-effects if taken in too higher doses or for too long. I was on it myself for a while back and my GP refused to renew my prescription at one point despite it appearing to have been of help - arthritis in my case.

" I was on it myself for a while back"

And did you ever get covid? eh ... eh ... come on now, you are living proof!
Do you know people who have had it and you were just the 'lucky' one?
 
" I was on it myself for a while back"

And did you ever get covid? eh ... eh ... come on now, you are living proof!
Do you know people who have had it and you were just the 'lucky' one?
It's a fair cop guvner! I admit it: I didn't have Covid - mind you that was about 5 years ago and I was never an early adopter for anything..... finally got rid of the privy last year as part of my concerted drive to be to be virus-ready.
 
Bitchute again.
Yes, absolutely true that it's been around for yonks.
Yes it's also absolutely true that the "repurposing" of known medicines has been looking at this one for some years already and that it may well have beneficial effects for the virus amongst a host of other conditions.
What is definitely not true is that it's "safe" in the sense of say Vitamin C.
It has always been regarded as being possibly risky for people with eyesight problems and for oldsters...i.e anyone over the age of 65 and there are some nasty side-effects if taken in too higher doses or for too long. I was on it myself for a while back and my GP refused to renew my prescription at one point despite it appearing to have been of help - arthritis in my case.

Yes Bitchute again.

This should be a giant red flag to everyone.
It's getting harder to weigh information, good or bad, due to censorship.
 
Yes Bitchute again.

This should be a giant red flag to everyone.
It's getting harder to weigh information, good or bad, due to censorship.
I disagree. It ain't censorship but volume and access. What is definitely changing is that it's got far easier to get at information generally but that information is in a completely uncontrolled (and uncontrollable) deluge where quality and quantity are the biggest casualties. It is no longer fashionable to actually read stuff that isn't in some easily accessible place or in a format that does any more than give a sketchy outline and a skewed point of view. For every conspiracy centred item that's "pro" something there will be another that's against. The older safeguards are no longer fit for porpoise and nothing has replaced them.
 
C,mon dude. she's hot. Wish she was my doctor. I'd believe anything she said over the snake Faucci.
You definitely win that one. I defer to your greater discernment.. It had been nagging me though, quite why I could never take Fauci completely seriously and thanks to you it's now crystal clear: he's really really not hot.
 
Top