Asian Coronavirus Outbreak
- Thread starter MasterOfCoin
- Start date
- Watchers 64
Atilla
Legendary member
- Messages
- 20,807
- Likes
- 4,007
DIY - Urine Analysis...
Urinate on a tree trunk.
If ants crawl up the trunk, you have sugar,
If it dries up immediately, blood pressure,
Cholesterol if it smells like meat,
Alzheimer's if you pee without opening the zipper,
Parkinson if you miss the tree trunk
Prostate if you're peeing on your feet instead of a tree
If you can't smell the urine, then you have covid19
Get well soon...
Urinate on a tree trunk.
If ants crawl up the trunk, you have sugar,
If it dries up immediately, blood pressure,
Cholesterol if it smells like meat,
Alzheimer's if you pee without opening the zipper,
Parkinson if you miss the tree trunk
Prostate if you're peeing on your feet instead of a tree
If you can't smell the urine, then you have covid19
Get well soon...
timsk
Legendary member
- Messages
- 8,660
- Likes
- 3,378
Good letter to send to your MP - cribbed from Lockdown Sceptics:
Dear (MP),
I’d appreciate your response to the questions below:
As the number of PCR tests being done has increased massively over the course of the summer, why are the case numbers consistently presented to the public without a clear framework of percentages of the tests done?
Why is a positive test now automatically called a ‘case’?
Why is the fatally flawed PCR test still being used to measure cases when the only statistics of any real importance are deaths and hospitalisations?
Does Matt Hancock understand that ‘less than 1%’ false positives when a virus is circulating at such low levels means that most positive cases are in fact false positives? Does he even care?
Why does he insist that the case numbers are doubling every seven days when they’re clearly not? Is he just really thick? Is he blatantly dishonest? Is he both?
If it’s down to dishonesty, why is he lying to the public?
Why was yesterday’s television briefing by Whitty and Vallance concentrating on a potential 49,000 ‘cases’? Is this because they really like big, scary numbers?
Why are they being encouraged to extrapolate the currently non-existent doubling as part of a worst case scenario?
Have they been told to do this by Hancock? By Johnson? Is this why they cover their backs with the repeated use of words such as ‘if’ and ‘could’?
Why is everyone so keen to use the word ‘exponential’ when any increase (I include France and Spain in this) has been nothing of the sort?
Why is everyone so keen to use France and Spain as examples, but not Germany, Sweden, etc.?
Why are scientific advisors being wheeled out to smooth the path for further restrictions with their doom-laden scaremongering?
If the ‘worst case scenario’ of 200 deaths a day from Covid by Hallowe’en is true, is that really enough reason to lock down the country again?
If 200 people died a day of flu, would it be front page news? Would it lead to a tv address by the PM outlining yet more restrictions on civil liberties?
If masks and social distancing work, then why no discernible impact on flu and pneumonia deaths?
As the pool of people vulnerable to becoming seriously ill from Covid is limited and shares many of the criteria of the pool of those vulnerable to serious illness from other respiratory ailments, what is the likelihood of them dying of both, twice?
Why did we not lock down the country in the winter of 1999-2000, when (off the top of my head) 50,000 died? See also (again off the top of my head) the bad flu seasons of 2014-2015/2017-2018?
Is the ongoing issue of casually assigning Covid deaths to those who died with, rather than of Covid being properly addressed?
Are you surprised to discover that keeping work colleagues, schoolchildren and families apart for months and then allowing them to meet again has resulted in an uptick in infections of all kinds?
If the government hadn’t locked the country down over the summer, do you think more people might have developed immunity to the virus by now?
Why does Patrick Vallance keep insisting that immunity in the population is at such low levels? Has he not heard of T cell immunity?
If the majority of new cases are in care homes, followed by workplaces and schools, how will closing pubs early or preventing people meeting socially in groups of seven have any effect on these?
Why do the latest restrictions treat outdoor spaces as though they were indoor spaces?
Why is the government paying any attention whatsoever to what Neil Ferguson has to say?
Why does the government think it’s in any way appropriate to rush through a vaccine, and then start by injecting the most vulnerable people in the population with it?
Seeing as bad flu seasons are often the result of ineffective vaccines, why would even a safe Covid vaccine be any more successful, particularly as there is no coronavirus vaccine in existence as yet?
If the NHS is in imminent danger of being overwhelmed, why have the Nightingale hospitals been mothballed?
If the NHS isn’t in imminent danger of being overwhelmed, why do we need another lockdown?
As the NHS wasn’t overwhelmed in the Spring, why does the government assume it will be now – or is that no longer the primary reason for imposing further restrictions on the public?
If ‘protecting the NHS’ is no longer the primary reason for imposing further restrictions on the public, then what is the reason?
And finally…
When is this Government going to take responsibility for its poor decisions and stop blaming, threatening, and punishing the British public for a catastrophe of its own making? And when are you going to stop defending its actions?
Dear (MP),
I’d appreciate your response to the questions below:
As the number of PCR tests being done has increased massively over the course of the summer, why are the case numbers consistently presented to the public without a clear framework of percentages of the tests done?
Why is a positive test now automatically called a ‘case’?
Why is the fatally flawed PCR test still being used to measure cases when the only statistics of any real importance are deaths and hospitalisations?
Does Matt Hancock understand that ‘less than 1%’ false positives when a virus is circulating at such low levels means that most positive cases are in fact false positives? Does he even care?
Why does he insist that the case numbers are doubling every seven days when they’re clearly not? Is he just really thick? Is he blatantly dishonest? Is he both?
If it’s down to dishonesty, why is he lying to the public?
Why was yesterday’s television briefing by Whitty and Vallance concentrating on a potential 49,000 ‘cases’? Is this because they really like big, scary numbers?
Why are they being encouraged to extrapolate the currently non-existent doubling as part of a worst case scenario?
Have they been told to do this by Hancock? By Johnson? Is this why they cover their backs with the repeated use of words such as ‘if’ and ‘could’?
Why is everyone so keen to use the word ‘exponential’ when any increase (I include France and Spain in this) has been nothing of the sort?
Why is everyone so keen to use France and Spain as examples, but not Germany, Sweden, etc.?
Why are scientific advisors being wheeled out to smooth the path for further restrictions with their doom-laden scaremongering?
If the ‘worst case scenario’ of 200 deaths a day from Covid by Hallowe’en is true, is that really enough reason to lock down the country again?
If 200 people died a day of flu, would it be front page news? Would it lead to a tv address by the PM outlining yet more restrictions on civil liberties?
If masks and social distancing work, then why no discernible impact on flu and pneumonia deaths?
As the pool of people vulnerable to becoming seriously ill from Covid is limited and shares many of the criteria of the pool of those vulnerable to serious illness from other respiratory ailments, what is the likelihood of them dying of both, twice?
Why did we not lock down the country in the winter of 1999-2000, when (off the top of my head) 50,000 died? See also (again off the top of my head) the bad flu seasons of 2014-2015/2017-2018?
Is the ongoing issue of casually assigning Covid deaths to those who died with, rather than of Covid being properly addressed?
Are you surprised to discover that keeping work colleagues, schoolchildren and families apart for months and then allowing them to meet again has resulted in an uptick in infections of all kinds?
If the government hadn’t locked the country down over the summer, do you think more people might have developed immunity to the virus by now?
Why does Patrick Vallance keep insisting that immunity in the population is at such low levels? Has he not heard of T cell immunity?
If the majority of new cases are in care homes, followed by workplaces and schools, how will closing pubs early or preventing people meeting socially in groups of seven have any effect on these?
Why do the latest restrictions treat outdoor spaces as though they were indoor spaces?
Why is the government paying any attention whatsoever to what Neil Ferguson has to say?
Why does the government think it’s in any way appropriate to rush through a vaccine, and then start by injecting the most vulnerable people in the population with it?
Seeing as bad flu seasons are often the result of ineffective vaccines, why would even a safe Covid vaccine be any more successful, particularly as there is no coronavirus vaccine in existence as yet?
If the NHS is in imminent danger of being overwhelmed, why have the Nightingale hospitals been mothballed?
If the NHS isn’t in imminent danger of being overwhelmed, why do we need another lockdown?
As the NHS wasn’t overwhelmed in the Spring, why does the government assume it will be now – or is that no longer the primary reason for imposing further restrictions on the public?
If ‘protecting the NHS’ is no longer the primary reason for imposing further restrictions on the public, then what is the reason?
And finally…
When is this Government going to take responsibility for its poor decisions and stop blaming, threatening, and punishing the British public for a catastrophe of its own making? And when are you going to stop defending its actions?
timsk
Legendary member
- Messages
- 8,660
- Likes
- 3,378
Here's a cracking link to 'Docs4opendebate', a Belgian site with text of a letter signed by 497 medical doctors and a further 1,565 medically trained health professionals: Open letter from medical doctors and health professionals to all belgian authorities and all belgian media
Apart from being very well written, the letter contains over 50 links to verify any claims made. The one that really stood out for me (and I've only looked at a handful) is a link to the company that created the PCR test which is behind the rising case numbers (which, for the most part, aren't cases at all). They state repeatedly about the test - and I quote: "The detection result of this product is only for clinical reference, and it should not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment."
Enjoy!
Tim.
Apart from being very well written, the letter contains over 50 links to verify any claims made. The one that really stood out for me (and I've only looked at a handful) is a link to the company that created the PCR test which is behind the rising case numbers (which, for the most part, aren't cases at all). They state repeatedly about the test - and I quote: "The detection result of this product is only for clinical reference, and it should not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment."
Enjoy!
Tim.
counter_violent
Legendary member
- Messages
- 12,655
- Likes
- 3,785
What has happened to you Tim !
Gone from deferential subservient unquestioning rule follower to deviant reactionary renegade.
Could it be something to do with the company you keep!
counter_violent
Legendary member
- Messages
- 12,655
- Likes
- 3,785
Covid: Clashes as police shut down protest over new rules
At least three protesters and nine officers are injured in London, while 16 people are arrested.
www.bbc.co.uk
David Knight
Established member
- Messages
- 946
- Likes
- 213
The self appointed fact checkers
Public Health England See above article):
“It is important to note that detecting viral material by PCR does not indicate that the virus is fully intact and infectious, i.e. able to cause infection in other people. The isolation of infectious virus from positive individuals requires virus culture methods. These methods can only be conducted in laboratories with specialist containment facilities and are time consuming and complex.”
Docs 4 Opendebate (see tims' post):
The use of the non-specific PCR test, which produces many false positives, showed an exponential picture. This test was rushed through with an emergency procedure and was never seriously self-tested. The creator expressly warned that this test was intended for research and not for diagnostics.
The PCR test works with cycles of amplification of genetic material – a piece of genome is amplified each time. Any contamination (e.g. other viruses, debris from old virus genomes) can possibly result in false positives.
Dominic Raab "93% FALSE positive"
Even this statement will not counter the FEAR of being fined.
If you do not fight for your freedom you will have ..... no freedom.
But it hasn't made any difference in Asda has it?
Public Health England See above article):
“It is important to note that detecting viral material by PCR does not indicate that the virus is fully intact and infectious, i.e. able to cause infection in other people. The isolation of infectious virus from positive individuals requires virus culture methods. These methods can only be conducted in laboratories with specialist containment facilities and are time consuming and complex.”
Docs 4 Opendebate (see tims' post):
The use of the non-specific PCR test, which produces many false positives, showed an exponential picture. This test was rushed through with an emergency procedure and was never seriously self-tested. The creator expressly warned that this test was intended for research and not for diagnostics.
The PCR test works with cycles of amplification of genetic material – a piece of genome is amplified each time. Any contamination (e.g. other viruses, debris from old virus genomes) can possibly result in false positives.
Dominic Raab "93% FALSE positive"
Even this statement will not counter the FEAR of being fined.
If you do not fight for your freedom you will have ..... no freedom.
But it hasn't made any difference in Asda has it?
Attachments
David Knight
Established member
- Messages
- 946
- Likes
- 213
Theatre, deception and perception manipulation
Killing police officers seems to be a recent trend which, for me, is a red flag in itself. My guess is the 1% want the general public to have sympathy for the police while they are busy inflicting violence on peaceful demonstrators.
You’ll recall how the clapping ritual for the NHS was used to hide the fact that the hospitals were empty while your relatives were left to die in care homes while others were denied treatment and operations.
To illustrate their dedication in the face of possible death from a flu virus we were shown medical staff twerking on tic tok. Apparently this theatre was enough to convince people that the problem is really about conspiracy theorists who refuse to wear a damn mask putting lives at risk in the supermarket. These people, we were told deserve to die of a flu virus while being denied treatment by the NHS, an institution they’ve paid into their entire working lives.
A critical thinking person would expect to see actual evidence of a pandemic. All we saw was blatant hoaxing
While it's nice to see Tim, who once told me to get a grip, slowly coming over to thedark light side I am still one of the few, as it were- and that will be increasingly dangerous for us if there is no pushback soon.
Expect, at some point, a clapping ritual for the brave officers who, twice, have had to beat some sense into the ‘crazy anti vaxxers’ and ‘extreme right’ ‘covidiots’ at Trafalgar Square.
I'll be decoding the above story later on deeper and down.
Killing police officers seems to be a recent trend which, for me, is a red flag in itself. My guess is the 1% want the general public to have sympathy for the police while they are busy inflicting violence on peaceful demonstrators.
You’ll recall how the clapping ritual for the NHS was used to hide the fact that the hospitals were empty while your relatives were left to die in care homes while others were denied treatment and operations.
To illustrate their dedication in the face of possible death from a flu virus we were shown medical staff twerking on tic tok. Apparently this theatre was enough to convince people that the problem is really about conspiracy theorists who refuse to wear a damn mask putting lives at risk in the supermarket. These people, we were told deserve to die of a flu virus while being denied treatment by the NHS, an institution they’ve paid into their entire working lives.
A critical thinking person would expect to see actual evidence of a pandemic. All we saw was blatant hoaxing
While it's nice to see Tim, who once told me to get a grip, slowly coming over to the
Expect, at some point, a clapping ritual for the brave officers who, twice, have had to beat some sense into the ‘crazy anti vaxxers’ and ‘extreme right’ ‘covidiots’ at Trafalgar Square.
I'll be decoding the above story later on deeper and down.
Last edited:
counter_violent
Legendary member
- Messages
- 12,655
- Likes
- 3,785
The problem is that "questioning minds" still have to operate to a large extent within the context norms of wider society. However much it grates!
David Knight
Established member
- Messages
- 946
- Likes
- 213
I'll keep chiselling away at it in my own way for better or worse CV (unfortunate initials' in these challenging times'
)The 'context norms of wider society' are becoming the problem, not the 'Questioning minds' When questions are regarded as a threat by the state, focus on the state.
The planned 'new normal' 'context norms' are rapidly closing in. At this point, anyone including Icke, is welcome to oppose it
counter_violent
Legendary member
- Messages
- 12,655
- Likes
- 3,785
I'll keep chiselling away at it in my own way for better or worse CV (unfortunate initials' in these challenging times'
The 'context norms of wider society' are becoming the problem, not the 'Questioning minds' When questions are regarded as a threat by the state, focus on the state.
The planned 'new normal' 'context norms' are rapidly closing in. At this point, anyone including Icke, is welcome to oppose it
It's everywhere we look.
Govt.
Institutions.
Corporate Capitalism.
MSM.
Social Media.
List is endless.
One gets tired of battling it all. Too many fronts.
Atilla
Legendary member
- Messages
- 20,807
- Likes
- 4,007
Money and Greed is at the top of the list.
Most things can be explained by greed and pursuit of money.
All about tilting the playing field in favour of ones so called freaking "National Interest".
Just my tuppence worth.
David Knight
Established member
- Messages
- 946
- Likes
- 213
Natural to feel that way. It's a battle. Some days I feel exactly the same. Other days it's actually quite exciting that we are living through what will become a giant chapter in human history (although the plot has a familiar ring to it) It's a cliche, but we cannot take freedom for granted, we have to fight to maintain it
The enemy has their problems too. My reaction to Trafalgar is that they are so potentially weak that the cannot allow any small resistance to grow. They know that if they turn off the constant media bombardment for just 24 hours, then people will slide straight back into getting on with their lives like going to the beach and causing 'a major incident'
The biggest problem is the masses refusal to act until they see which way the wind is blowing. But that can change in 24 hrs. All it takes is for the 'wrong' bit of truth to hit home and the whole pack of cards comes down. That's a big fear for the other side
The bottom line is 2 things-(1) that life is in the moment. Life is now, not the past or the future. If you have anxiety hanging over you, if you live in fear or feel defeated (and we all have to fight the tendency) then you are not really living. Personally I work obssesively which helps.
(2) That the one thing 'they' fear most is our humanity. We are dealing with sociopaths. That's what the (anti) sociial distancing and masks are about. that is where they are weak. So that is where you push back. Go out there every day and be human.
new_trader
Legendary member
- Messages
- 6,770
- Likes
- 1,655
Money and Greed is at the top of the list.
Most things can be explained by greed and pursuit of money.
All about tilting the playing field in favour of ones so called freaking "National Interest".
Just my tuppence worth.
The real problem is that the vast majority of the world's population are midwits.
The destructive power of the “midwit”
Tom Woods gave a great talk recently at Mises University, wherein he explains the tragedy of the lockdowns. One thing he mentioned that I found fascinating is the phenomenon of the “midwit”, a term…
republicreborn.com
David Knight
Established member
- Messages
- 946
- Likes
- 213
The real problem is that the vast majority of the world's population are midwits.
The destructive power of the “midwit”
Tom Woods gave a great talk recently at Mises University, wherein he explains the tragedy of the lockdowns. One thing he mentioned that I found fascinating is the phenomenon of the “midwit”, a term…
I 'm very suspicious of everything these days. My favourites blog list is rapidly depleting as I weed out the hidden gatekeepers, traitors and cowards who are everywhere.
I don't have the time to dig into this particular one and this may not apply here, but it's worth mentioning, I would just say, we need to be wary of having subtle suggestions planted in our minds.
This line sounds like potential NLP: 'You’ve encountered these people. It’s impossible to talk to them, debate their opinions, or even attempt to change their minds. They are immune to alternative points of view,'
I challenge that viewpoint in any case. Now is the time to speak to as many people as possible. Suggestions like the above chip away at your mental state leaving you feeling what is planned is inevitable. It is not.
Can we really not plant a seed? If these people love to explain the agenda to you, get them to explain. Act dumb.
' look, I'm a bit confused about all this. You sound like you know what you're talking about. You've no doubt heard of Kary Mullis of course,..'
No,,,who... Larry who??
' KARRY! Sorry, , I just assumed you would've heard of him. no well, he's the guy that invented the test they're using for covid. and he specifically said you absolutely can't use the PCR test to identify a virus.'
Why do you suppose they would be using something they know doesn't work? Or do you think that they dont know it doesn't work and maybe someone oughta tell them? what do you think?'
'well, I've never even heard of this guy, do you have a link'.?
'Yeah... of course..'
if you get pushback, talk about the Dominic Raab interview post #2482 93% failure rate.
If the midwits have that much power... then that power must be harnessed somehow. Maybe that's the key to it.
Germany is leading the way. They are well placed to recognise the danger 10 10 2020 will be even bigger than the last one there.
Last edited:
This article is very interesting:
https://intermarketandmore.finanza.com/covid-19-e-le-grandi-pandemie-del-passato-90183.html
COVID-19 and the great pandemics of the past:
If we listen to television, if we read the newspapers, we seem to be living in the nightmare of the Covid-19, a pandemic disaster never seen before.
However, we must be realistic. It is true that the number of deaths and about 24 million infected makes an impression, but if we try to look back, making the necessary proportions (since today there are 6 billion on planet Earth), how devastating is this Covid-19 percentage?
image post
https://intermarketandmore.finanza.com/covid-19-e-le-grandi-pandemie-del-passato-90183.html
COVID-19 and the great pandemics of the past:
If we listen to television, if we read the newspapers, we seem to be living in the nightmare of the Covid-19, a pandemic disaster never seen before.
However, we must be realistic. It is true that the number of deaths and about 24 million infected makes an impression, but if we try to look back, making the necessary proportions (since today there are 6 billion on planet Earth), how devastating is this Covid-19 percentage?
image post
trendie
Legendary member
- Messages
- 6,875
- Likes
- 1,433
The problem with stats is comparing like for like.This article is very interesting:
https://intermarketandmore.finanza.com/covid-19-e-le-grandi-pandemie-del-passato-90183.html
COVID-19 and the great pandemics of the past:
If we listen to television, if we read the newspapers, we seem to be living in the nightmare of the Covid-19, a pandemic disaster never seen before.
However, we must be realistic. It is true that the number of deaths and about 24 million infected makes an impression, but if we try to look back, making the necessary proportions (since today there are 6 billion on planet Earth), how devastating is this Covid-19 percentage?
All the big killers of the past happened at times of ignorance of germ theory, bio-chemistry, etc.
We have vaccines, technologies to detect illnesses, and label them, and a medical infrastructure to evaluate the threat, and contain it.
All the past had were superstitions and the hope garlic would drive away the demon spirits.
Some of the greatest improvements of life expectancy come from simple things like clean water, and separating drinking water from sewage water.
We have a lower tolerance for illness and death, so we scare more easily.
So even a small number of deaths seem like the end of the world.
new_trader
Legendary member
- Messages
- 6,770
- Likes
- 1,655
I'd say it has much more to do with the mass media than anything else. Besides, one survey revealed that people think the death rate from covid-19 is 30 times higher than it actually is...how do you explain that other than the terror campaign of the mass media?
Similar threads
