Atilla
Legendary member
- Messages
- 20,844
- Likes
- 4,027
Did he succumb to the Covid lurgy?
I don't think it was the Covid but he hasn't posted for over a year so I fear the worst.
I miss his well travelled views.
Did he succumb to the Covid lurgy?
I PM'd him in January last year as c_v had noted (on the Brexit thread, I think) that he hadn't posted since November 2018. I never received a reply which is most uncharacteristic of him - as is not posting on the forums. So, I too fear the worst. He was well into his 80s I believe - so he had a reasonable innings.I don't think it was the Covid but he hasn't posted for over a year so I fear the worst. . .
Splitlink was the one who often raised the issue of population over growth and dangers it posed.
I always thought as the distribution of income and science got better that similar to Western observations other countries would eventually have declining birth rates to stop the rise.
Didn't expect a new virus to limit old age. Mother nature knows best.
Old age is what limits old age, the death rate from Covid is insignificant, to think it has any population control properties is just a theory.
Perhaps, but it's not so much that, as humans being unwilling to know better.Mother nature knows best.
I seem to remember an experiment years ago about - what happens when too many rats are in too small a space with no food.
They fought each other to the death and the few survivors became cannibal.--
Perhaps the rich will be the survivors, robots doing the chores and a few maintenance staff as needed.
This could be a dry run for a super bug aaaaaaaaaaaah !!
The death rate of the elderly over the young is what may be termed statistically significant.
Relative to what? In the order of things, what are the major causes of death to the elderly and where does Covid-19 fall in that list, and that list needs to be presented when the stats actually have some meaning that the majority have agreed really make sense, in reality.
Deaths relative to age of the victim. Predominantly, older the person higher the % of deaths due to Covid.
% rates go up above 50+.
The world can have both population decline and economic growth at the same time. In fact it would be the best thing to happen to humanity.Splitlink was the one who often raised the issue of population over growth and dangers it posed.
I always thought as the distribution of income and science got better that similar to Western observations other countries would eventually have declining birth rates to stop the rise.
This holds true for everything not just Covid. How does it compare to death rates from everything else, where in the league of death does Covid figure amongst all the other causes of death?
Why would you when you can get paid for sitting on your arse on a guaranteed wage and the business doesn’t have to take any risk? - some of the “casuals” are earning a lot more on handouts than they would breaking their proverbials working.Clubs, pubs and cafes allowed 10 people to sit down and eat meals at the weekend in Queensland.
Guess what none of them bothered opening in my area.
At the moment whilst we are above average at approx., 33K we are not peak what was experienced in these previous two years.
I said in an earlier post that doctors had been told not to record as corvid where underlying reasons. It turns out that was just one hospital trust which had gone against government guidance.And the 33K figure is questionable, there will be a percentage of deaths that have been attributed to Covid by doctors under govt instruction because of the pandemic. In a normal year many of those deaths would have been spread around all the other usual causes, but because of Covid many more will have needlessly been attributed to Covid when the real cause was something else.
Then we have the lockup deaths to take into account, which is a brand new category of death, so while someone may have died of cancer because of a lack of treatment caused by the lockdown will they also have 'died with lockdown' recorded on their death certificate in the same way that someone with cancer who died with covid will have 'died with covid' added to their death certificate (who had died from cancer)?
I said in an earlier post that doctors had been told not to record as corvid where underlying reasons. It turns out that was just one hospital trust which had gone against government guidance.
Here’s the government “instruction” which is not as devious as you appear imply:
3.
• •
Referring deaths to the coroner
Covid-19 is an acceptable direct or underlying cause of death for the purposes of completing the Medical Certificate of Cause of Death
Covid-19 is not a reason on its own to refer a death to a coroner under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.
• That Covid-19 is a notifiable disease under the Health Protection (Notification) Regulations 2010 does not mean referral to a coroner is required by virtue of its notifiable status.
Medical practitioners are required to certify causes of death “to the best of their knowledge and belief”. Without diagnostic proof, if appropriate and to avoid delay, medical practitioners can circle ‘2’ in the MCCD (“information from post-mortem may be available later”) or tick Box B on the reverse of the MCCD for ante-mortem investigations. For example, if before death the patient had symptoms typical of COVID- 19 infection, but the test result has not been received, it would be satisfactory to give ‘COVID-19’ as the cause of death, tick Box B and then share the test result when it