Soloquan
Established member
- Messages
- 646
- Likes
- 24
4 hours 5 minutes....Murray has a good chance at gold if he wins his semi that is
Hope so, I've got a tenner on him beating Djokavic at 5/4 👍
4 hours 5 minutes....Murray has a good chance at gold if he wins his semi that is
SD et al. Have a good weekend.
See you on Monday
why? I am not the one running scams and supporting impossible claims of 100s of pips per day
samirs
I think you're a bit harsh on sd - in the thousands of posts he's made on this thread he's mentioned wallstreet only a few times. I wouldn't call that pumping the guy. At worst he may be guilty of being taken in by the claims, but little more than that.
i would accept assessment that as a respect for your post as a moderator
i hope you also appreciate my point
members specially newbies (who may be silent or even guests) take up veteran and legendary members' posts at face value
hence, those and even other members need to be careful (specially in the manner and language) when recommending some vendors or services
certainly if I am a newbie and a legendary member says that 'xyz is the greatest trader ever' then it is more than a nudge for me to try their services.
anyway i am done on this topic and out
.... although,
"But as they enjoy their time in the sun, The Mirror’s Walter channels Ian Botham as a word of warning.
"Always kick an Aussie when he is down, " Botham once said.
"Because he may get up again.”
we may become emotional about it but i have made only statement of facts
so i can only respond to the constructive comments someone has in response to the factual statements i have made so far
you have joined forex factory only 2 days back and made 2 posts so far.... both referring to this blog....so this blog must have had deep influence on you
that actually supports my point that people do and will come to the forum to seek guidance and help
one (specially the main protagonists ) needs to ensure that any statements supporting external vendors are worded carefully....sharing external sources / links is one thing and can be quite useful but excessively and repeatedly endorsing someone (specially one who has documented scam threads against them and has been banned from the forum for that reason) is another
i have nothing personal against anyone but i only showed the courage against the potential backlash...and i did it since i saw repeated instances of excessive praise for a vendor despite requests to consider documented evidence of scam / fraud on this very same forum
i would like for the thread to continue to flourish and I have openly praised SDs effort on multiple occassions
i think legitimate criticism should also be taken in the same stride and no one should be treated "above law" just because of mass popularism
ironically I need to write this on traders forum .....aren't traders expected to logical, unbiased, factual and not emotional
sd
Those "live" calls were pretty suspect as were the "reported" results of them. It was all the doubt and the evidenced manipulation of those results which led to the furore in the first place.
I think I have mentioned before that, aside from more general explanations of strategy etc, it is extremely dangerous to listen to anyone but yourself.
sd
Those "live" calls were pretty suspect as were the "reported" results of them. It was all the doubt and the evidenced manipulation of those results which led to the furore in the first place.
I think I have mentioned before that, aside from more general explanations of strategy etc, it is extremely dangerous to listen to anyone but yourself.
I have just performed an Fibonacci expansion on this thread and the next Wallstreet1928 argument is due in January.
No need to talk about it again until then. :clap::clap: