Currently L FTSE 6885. Looking for 6903..possibly more, could be wrong but stops fairly tight.
Currently L FTSE 6885. Looking for 6903..possibly more, could be wrong but stops fairly tight.
I shorted at 81.3, but it is a close stop and little risk.
Well at least one of us might get some pips! :clover:
joseph1986
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,899
- Likes
- 90
Britain wants influence, don't be surprised if the ftse gets hammered today from the pound. Should have remained.
counter_violent
Legendary member
- Messages
- 12,669
- Likes
- 3,787
He's a lunatic. 9/11 conspiracy - new world order - global government - the works...
No point asking him...he's clueless.
I would not say that. Perhaps, a teeny weeny bit biased
joseph1986
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,899
- Likes
- 90
911 wasnt an inside job, ok why did building 7 fall? Surely some structural engineer can say some impact caused it to fall...except there was no impact.
“In order to seek truth, it is necessary once in the course of our life to doubt, as far as possible, of all things.”
― René Descartes
I think you mean Building 7?
joseph1986
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,899
- Likes
- 90
3rd building same 5hit
seven or three.
why was 9/11 the first day in history a steel framed building collapsed due to a fire?
P
postman
So - hows that ftse doing. :whistling
Sonicscooter
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,811
- Likes
- 351
This kind of thing has gone on throughout modern history, Gulf of Tokin and Pearl Harbour for example.
Would anyone trust the US government.
Just a wild guess but maybe the two passenger jets crashing into the structure with thousands of gallons of jet fuel may have had something to do with it?
Anyway - thats me done on the subject.
Sonicscooter
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,811
- Likes
- 351
Most of which went up in a external fireball on impact.......anyway, you believe the media "programming"
Sonicscooter
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,811
- Likes
- 351
joseph1986
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,899
- Likes
- 90
I think he didn't get it, structurally a steel framed building can't fall with fire only without impact effecting the foundation. Just like overcooking a cake won't cause the top two layers to be leveled with the bottom two lol
Sonicscooter
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,811
- Likes
- 351
I think he didn't get it, structurally a steel framed building can't fall with fire only without impact effecting the foundation. Just like overcooking a cake won't cause the top two layers to be leveled with the bottom two lol
I look at it at a simple level, as i'm thick and live up North, anyone with a level head would look at the whole story and come to the conclusion that there are just too many discrepancies and events that seem suspicious or don't add up for the official story to be 100% cast iron true.
But some people have a deep internal fear that the system the believe in isn't what they though after all, and God forbid interrupting a good nights sleep.
f2calv
Experienced member
- Messages
- 1,318
- Likes
- 278
AFAIK petrol/kerosene etc can only burn when it comes into contact with air/oxygen - so if you have a bucket of petrol and chuck in a match it'll burn off the top layer and work it's way down [albeit furiously so I wouldn't want to stand too close]. Bearing in mind the sheer quantity of kerosene held in such aircraft I believe that not all would have been burnt off as there would have been an oxygen dearth at the point of ignition to ignite so much fuel (i.e. a lack of fresh oxygen to replace that which was burnt up) hence momentum/gravity would have had time to carry some of the fuel deeper into the building - and thence down the elevator shafts and so forth causing the buckling of the support steels.
Just my 2 cents :innocent:
