Ingot54
Well-known member
- Messages
- 403
- Likes
- 62
Ive now had time to evaluate the Lindencourt method a little. I looked at over a period of 2 months on the gbp/usd and eur/usd(15m). I only ever manually backtest as it is more realistic. Im sure mechanically testing this would show better results.
If you were to take every entry as described in the method it would be a losing system in the long run. However no system should really be used like that.If the entry bar suddenly shoots up 15 pips would you be wise to get in?,NO, clearly not. What I did find that by being selective on entry good results look apparent. Taking the trades when the MAs are close on both seemed to show much better results. The +10/-10 on the rsi is a resonable add on condition. The money management methods described seem good enough so its really down to the user to make it pay. Its not the sort of system I use,I dont really trade Like that,but for anyone wanting a system,it has to be said its condition for entry are precise and Im sure some well disciplined traders will be able to make it pay.
I set-up my platform with the indies today, and have yet to fully digest all the material sent to me. In fact, I have not only received what I paid for, I have a second and third and a fourth approach, supplied quite unexpectedly. I can't help but sense Andrew's passion for this stuff, and I have no doubt he prides himself on ensuring his clients achieve success.
Here's what was in the box:
1) A basic Set of Indicators/template specifically for MT4 platform
2) Very clear and fully detailed .pdf including examples
3) An alternate method (.pdf) which identifies "really hot" setups, but fewer trades
4) A 4H method with rules, chart and detailed methodology
5) A .pdf explaining how to trade 1H and 15M charts together
6) Several recent trade example with fully detailed explanation of the trades
Further, Andrew contacted me to check that I had been able to get the template fully functional. And after I sent him a quick screen-shot, he confirmed I had it spot on.
His email turnaround is less than 24 hrs, and a couple of emails were returned within 3 hrs.
Tonight (Aussie Eastern time) I am road-testing the new vehicle, and it's looking good. There has been a bit of chop, but because of the 15M TF, I have not been at much loss on demo. However, there have been a couple of trades, and when I have time, the screen-shots will be posted ... minus Andrew's indicators ... showing entry/exits and any nuances I picked up.
I do not believe in back-testing ... a machine/software can trade back-data around the clock, and it might/might not tell anything.
But I am not a machine ... I can only forward test a maximum 12 hrs a day, and even then only occasionally could I actually do that. So computer back-testing has that flaw, imv, and that renders results unreliable.
Forward-testing, by a few traders making comparisons to promote accuracy and hopefully removing a bit of human error, is the real test. All discretionary systems will come up with results that depend not only on the experience of the operator, but also the MOOD of the operator.
So in the next couple of days I hope to post a casual review of the method, and a trade or two ... win or lose.
I have to agree with you Flash - it is not possible to take every trade, but then Andrew does give a few qualifying bits of advice to help avoid situations where you probably would be better to go fishing. I'll identify those when I can locate them in the literature.
So far so good ... back to the platform ... we have bigger news in 90 minutes, so I expect a bit of jockeying before then in the currencies.
Will be good to compare notes with you Flash.
Best wishes
Ivan