So T2W must invent some mechanical objective rules, right?
T2W are struggling because mechanical objective rules cannot be created that get riddy of scummy vendors whilst allowing their 2 or 3 favoured vendors to continue.
No
They need some sort of vision. At the moment the vision hasn't been shared, but I'm assured its there, and t2w will consequentially become a shining beacon, and that has to be good news,
It also helps if all parties, understand, share and believe in that vision. I'm not sure they do, I think many on t2w's side of the fence don't understand the situation, or the need for for change, time will tell.
I do think it helps if there are clear policies that can be communicated to members. Some rules could be mechanically enforced very easily, some will require subjective judgement, its not rocket science.
You know as well as I do why the sites dying (or maybe you don't), and its nothing to do with a lack of mechanical objective rules. Even in the cases where such rules exist they are rarely enforced anyway. At the time the site was growing they had very few rules, much lighter moderation, and NO team responsible for content. That's not just a coincidence either
Everyone knows a vendor cess pit is the only solution, and Steve's probably kicking himself for publicly dismissing the idea out of hand so early in the process.