combotrader, hi, Thx for the comments/question.
You are correct: My system/methodology is as simple as it gets, identifying repeatable high probability patterns of oscillator extremes/divergence with band/channel deviation at pre-identified areas of support/resistance, that results in with and against trend set-ups.
Therein lies the answer to why I use the macd and osma together when they are closely related.
Firstly I prefer histograms, and secondly, I identified a key high probability pattern of divergence when these oscillators two are viewed together, as summarised here:
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/showthread.php?t=26748 -and- detailedin the documents here:
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/showthread.php?t=25770.
The 'key pattern' of divergence revolves around seperate peak/trough regular immediate/sequential osma divergence at the same time as same
or seperate peak/trough regular immediate/sequential macd divergence for reversal set-ups and seperate peak/trough osma and macd hidden immediate divergence for reentry to trend set-ups.
In respect of Extreme readings, again i identified two key patterns of extremes when these two oscillators work together.
a. They either both reach an extrteme reading together and price is deviated from all 4 bollingers -or-
b. osma reaches an extreme first, then macd makes an extreme, higher/lower than the reading when osma made the extreme, at which point osma now shows same peak/trough divergence and the 10 bol (fastest) has come inside the 20 bol.
Of course all these set-ups require identifiable support/resistance and a price action confirmation to be valid, and I use the '3rd' cci based oscillator as another unrelated confirmation.
So there you have it, It's really just the patterns they form when viewed together. I hope this is a suitably complicate way of expalining a simple phenomenon, Lol.