alphadude
Established member
- Messages
- 566
- Likes
- 165
Yes, that's exactly what we'll be doing. There is already a certain amount of analysis and ranking on Zulutrade's own website, so what kind of analysis would you like to see that isn't already being covered ?
well zulu ranking does not make sense. Nor do other sites.
I would suggest you use industry standards ranking system; such as Sharpe Ratio, Sortino Ratio..etc.
ranking should correlate with performance. If you tell me an SP is raked #1; it should mean $$$ profit if I follow him.
all current sites suck at ranking. No sure about the reason; my guess is conflict of interest. They get paid if you follow SPs; and nobody gives a **** about performance.
think about it; if Zulu get paid by collecting commission from followers; and also not sharing their proceeds with SPs because they had a negative month or a 700 DD; then that works for them. Followers are the pigs who get slaughtered in this case. SPs get nothing.
if SPs makes money; Zulu get to share it with them. That's no good.
It's only a theory; but it makes perfect sense to me at the moment. I could not find any other explanation to why Zulu and others suck at ranking.
same thing with Currensee; they collect 2% management fee from followers regardless if you make money or not. SPs get paid only if they have a profitable month. Currensee is the winner at all times. Hell they rank their SPs to attract sheep.
Last edited: