arabianights
Legendary member
- Messages
- 6,721
- Likes
- 1,380
So an average loss of 1% a day which is a lot less than I would have imagined for new accounts.
Paul
nope... you're falling for a fallacy, but I can't remember what it's called...
So an average loss of 1% a day which is a lot less than I would have imagined for new accounts.
Paul
Even when losing money they, still, believe that success is within their grasp.
If the failure rate is so high (90-95%) why is trading so popular? It seems like providing service or products for traders has a higher chance of profitability. Any thoughts on this?
You are correct, there are more people making a living snakeoil vending to traders than there are traders making a living by trading.
I started a thread on this subject about a month ago, you can find some of my thoughts on the subject there:
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/gen...all-failed-traders-should-become-vendors.html
I wonder if the 90-95% failure rate is true, or maybe this is just put out by the brokers and spread betting companies and system vendors. If you told most people they had a 10% chance of changing there life they are likely to give it a go i.e buy the course, and lose some money with the brokers, they have also been pre-warned that they are likely to fail so when they do fail they accept it and say "only 5-10% of people make it, never mind I gave it a go ". Perhaps the real stats are 99.9% of people fail and the real winners are the brokers and the system sellers, but if people were told that 99.9% of people fail I think people would probably give it a miss.:?:
that is a very good post.
i wonder what the failure rate is per market like Shares, forex, Options, Futures.
It cannot be 95% in all areas. It would be interesting if one of those areas has a higher survival rate and why.
I think that 95% fail rate is put out by interested parties and that it is self generating, by which I mean that, as people fail, so do they justify their losses by becoming one of an imagined majority.
Those who are successful are, either, not believed or do not publicise themselves.
Personally, I believe that the minority take money from the majority. That has always been the case in other forms of business and I don't see why trading should be any different.
If we, as traders, are going to proceed it does not pay us to dwell too much on the fate of others. Lack of optimism leaves us fearful and seeking the advice of those who know less than us and, in many cases want to charge us for their knowledge.
Thus, he who believes himself to be one of the 95% puts his trust, and money, into someone whom he believes to be one of the 5%.[/QUOTE
A paradox then, until somebody is successful it is unlikely they are going to put them self in the 5% category, and by not putting them self in the 5% category they automatically put them self in the 95% category and there trust in people they believe to be in the 5% category and this action in itself probably keeps them in the 95% group.
A paradox then, until somebody is successful it is unlikely they are going to put them self in the 5% category, and by not putting them self in the 5% category they automatically put them self in the 95% category and there trust in people they believe to be in the 5% category and this action in itself probably keeps them in the 95% group.
Very hard explanation but I got the point. Easier to say: when you think you are unsuccessful you will be unsuccessful.
I don't think it is as simple as mindset, if you are not successful then by definition you are in the 95% category regardless of your beliefs or confidence. To be unsuccessful at trading and believe you were in the top 5% would be extreme over confidence (very dangerous when dealing with financial markets) and perhaps slightly mad. Perhaps the answer is to have confidence in your ability to get to the 5% category and stop trusting your money with the vendors who say they are in the 5% category but are liars. This would mean self teaching which is not something many people are used to.