Cant one of the Stealth traders shag a Turtle and if Darwin is correct we will have a perfect genetically modified trader
That's actually not too far from the truth, but I had something a bit different in mind.
Take note of this little gem:
http://www.trade2win.com/boards/for...ed-forex-market-made-money-3.html#post1051638
It was a host of successful trade profiles such as this that gave me that idea for Collaborative Trading Profiles. Essentially, "from many come one," is the idea.
If you have people who genuinely know what they are doing with a trading account and they use unique tools for entering and exiting positions, while each takes responsibility for managing a different trade type, the resultant net/net effect (I theorized) would be something approximating a 100% aggregate accuracy to a defined aggregate (netted) target.
Not the same as the typical fund management strategy, where multiple (and varying) instrument types are traded, but multiple instrument types across multiple trading system types within the same liquid market.
With each Collaborative Trading Profile we do, we realize just how effortless the approach to trading turns out to be. We are still learning a lot about the Collaborative trading process, but there seems to be no limit to what we can do together, as opposed to operating as individuals.
Thus, StealthTrade Profiles were born.
In the profile above, I had to manage 17 simultaneous trades independently. That level of focus is not humanly possible in a Manual Trading mode most of the time. In addition, I had to concern myself with making updates to the profile and responding to foolish people - all at the same time. At the end of 72 hours, I had net/net over $300k in profits and I did it in in full plain view - so no one with half a brain could question the results.
I cannot keep up with that level of trading on a daily basis, by myself. Impossible - I would burn out in less than one (1) month managing that many positions concurrently. However, having17 StealthTraders, each one responsible for managing one (1) pair and one (1) system or trade type at a time, all using a sort of Central Air Traffic Control (so-to-speak) to help keep their losses from colliding with other losses in the same "airspace," is not just a much more effective method for approaching a 4 trillion market, but it is turning out to be highly profitable with far less risk as well.
I don't expect any of the clueless retorting blithering fools in this thread to understand one word of what I just typed. But, the process of watching them make fools of themselves is somewhat amusing.
