This ties in with Frugi's comment "interest and satisfaction found in the process not the money".
This feels warm. What is it about an on-going process which IS Success that is not in an on-going process which IS Failure?
Or, without any attempt to befuddle, what is it that IS NOT in the on-going process of Success (and in that of Failure) which makes them what they are?
That doesn't make a lot of sense, but I'm leaving it in as it might come to me later. 😆
I guess what I'm asking Sulong is if Success is an 'attitude of travelling' - what is that attitude precisely? Because being hopeful, great expectations, desirous of a good result - these are all things with which people travel on the road. Some end in Success, some in Failure. There has to be a nuance which is significant as you can't call anything a Success or a Failure until it has become so - i.e. - final result, the end of that road. (edit: expansion of point) I can travel with a very confident and successful aspect about me, but it could all end in tears. Failure. Not Success. The destination is equally important, or there is the danger of deluding yourself into thinking 'everything is OK so far - so I must be doing the right thing'. Personally, when everything's going fine for me I'm wondering what I'm missing. Diligence? (end of edit).
So if the method or mode of travelling is important (which I am also convinced it is) - what IS that mode or method?