oildaytrader
Senior member
- Messages
- 2,806
- Likes
- 125
Some of the article is good. It starts off well. Unfortunately it heads off and states some things as facts that are simply untrue.
e.g. The very best mechanical systems have about 30% winning trades, which is below the 50% that a coin flip will produce.
Ha ha. Well I can prove that's untrue using his own comments. He also states that But with proper money management, one could take a far from perfect trading approach, even the coin flip, and have a fair shot at making a profit over time.
Well, mechanical systems are excellent at cementing a solid money management system, so take a mechanical system, good money management, give it a 50/50 random entry, and according to him you'll have a good shot at a profit, which would mean considerably more than 30% successful trades. Hell, I could knock you up five different mechanical systems in half an hour that would all be 40% successful trades. That's easy.
So, good article, but suffers from the "I've never seen it so it must be untrue" bias that is plastered over this thread.
Kinda like to share them?
I have dozens of fully automated trading systems which make > 50 % per annum.