counter_violent
Legendary member
- Messages
- 12,669
- Likes
- 3,787
CV,
As I pushed you for an answer to this question vis a vis Zelensky and Ukraine - I'll answer it vis a vis Putin and Russia.
My best guess is that for Putin it's not so much a matter of the number of lives lost per se - but the consequences of lives lost. That is to say, if the number that the Russians admit to becomes too high with little or no corresponding net gain - then this will undermine his presidency and pressure on him will start to mount. However, if he's achieving his goals, then the 'price' paid in terms of lives lost can be sold as a price worth paying to his domestic audience. So, it's a question of balance. At the moment, (in spite of your and c_v's protestations to the contrary), the number of lives lost is within acceptable bounds and Russians believe their objectives are being reached.
What are 'acceptable bounds'? Time for a trading analogy: think of price trending up in, say, a Keltner Channel. When it gets to either the upper or lower band, this may trigger action either to take profit or to exit the trade. However, while price remains in the channel and continues to trend upwards, the trade can continue indefinitely. This, I suspect, is how Putin will look at it and not care particularly about total death count. Doubtless, he'll be mindful of Stalin's famous quote: “A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths are a statistic”.
Tim.
When every bit of news is propagandized for Putin's domestic audience, lies on top of lies, how on earth can you believe that Russian military deaths are within acceptable limits.
Honestly, the mind boggles that you can even countenance such ridiculous thoughts.