Two comments to make about this video:
The first is that Russia claims to have destroyed up to half of the sixteen Himars launchers sent by the U.S. to Ukraine, leaving them with eight at best. However, even if we discount this as misinformation/propaganda, they've still only got a maximum of sixteen which is a fraction of the number of Tornado-S launchers used by the Russians. Their system is capable of firing rockets just as accurately as Himars and at much further ranges. That's not just me or Brian of The New Atlas saying this, it's acknowledged by Janes in this article:
Ukraine conflict: Russian forces employ guided rockets.
". . .Russia deploys the Tornado-S system, or complex, in brigades of four battalions. A battalion consists of three batteries with four launchers in each. Accompanying each launcher is a 9T234-2 trans loader vehicle based on the MAZ-543A 8×8 chassis, and this carries 12 rounds and is equipped with a crane. . ."
Note that Janes talks about Brigades plural. Just one brigade would have 48 launchers. If Russia has two brigades then that's 72 launchers etc.
If we're extremely generous to Ukraine and assume they still have all sixteen launchers and Russia doesn't have anywhere near the number Janes says it does, the very best Ukraine can hope for is that the two systems cancel one another out. The idea that Himars are a game changer that's going to change the course of the war is palpable nonsense.
The second point to make refers to a question posed at 3:33" when the interviewer asks the CEO of Lockheed Martin
"How fast can you do this?" [i.e. ramp up production of rockets for the Himars Launcher to 10,000 p/a]. And the answer is:
". . . in the order of 18 to 24 months". Yep, not days or weeks - but one and a half to
two years! In short, these Himars are going to spend more time in storage than they are in active service as the U.S. won't be able to supply Ukraine with anything like the numbers of rockets needed and in the time frame required.
To conclude, anyone who thinks that Himars is going to change the course of the war is not thinking this through clearly and logically. Needless to say, MSM don't mention any of this as it doesn't support the pure fiction that Ukraine can succeed in driving out the Russians.
Tim.